Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Résumé
Contexte
Méthodologie
Résultats
Conclusions
Human development reports.
Methods
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Outcomes
Statistical analysis
Baseline characteristic | Women (n = 619) | Men (n = 2575) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y | 66.1 ± 11.8 | 57.5 ± 11.9 | < 0.01 |
Systemic hypertension | 280(45.2) | 826 (32.1) | < 0.01 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 23.2 ± 3.7 | 23.6 ± 3.1 | 0.01 |
Diabetes mellitus | 322 (52.0) | 1002 (38.9) | < 0.01 |
Dyslipidemia | 403 (74.5) | 1607 (69.1) | 0.01 |
Current smoker | 1 (0.2) | 1324 (51.4) | < 0.01 |
Family history of premature CAD | 97 (15.7) | 570 (22.1) | < 0.01 |
Known prior angiographic obstructive CAD | 17 (2.7) | 169 (6.6) | < 0.01 |
Prior MI | 18 (2.9) | 239 (9.3) | < 0.01 |
Prior CABG | 3 (0.5) | 32 (1.2) | 0.10 |
Prior PCI | 2 (0.3) | 86 (3.3) | < 0.01 |
Known CKD | 19 (3.1) | 90 (3.5) | 0.60 |
Prior CVA | 25 (4.0) | 64 (2.5) | 0.03 |
COPD | 50 (8.1) | 236 (9.2) | 0.40 |
Classified as living in poverty | 255 (41.2) | 947 (36.8) | 0.04 |
Self-paid | 420 (67.9) | 1753 (68.1) | 0.08 |
STEMI type | 0.71 | ||
Anterior | 288 (46.5) | 1216 (47.2) | — |
Inferior | 299 (48.3) | 1254 (48.7) | — |
Posterior | 16 (2.6) | 55 (2.1) | — |
Lateral wall | 16 (2.6) | 51 (2.0) | — |
LBBB | 10 (1.6) | 43 (1.7) | 0.92 |
Cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival | 21 (3.4) | 104 (4.0) | 0.46 |
CHF at admission | 109 (17.6) | 316 (12.3) | < 0.01 |
Results
Baseline characteristics
Clinical outcomes
1-year outcome | Women (n = 510) | Men (n = 510) | P |
---|---|---|---|
MACE | 107 (20.9) | 73 (14.3) | 0.003 |
Mortality | 73 (14.3) | 44 (8.6) | 0.003 |
HF readmission | 36 (7.8) | 30 (6.2) | 0.28 |
Stroke | 7 (1.4) | 7 (1.4) | 0.92 |
Nonfatal MI | 20 (4.1) | 12 (2.4) | 0.11 |


1-year outcome (Men used as reference) | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
MACE | 1.560 | 1.159 | 2.101 | < 0.01 |
Mortality | 1.757 | 1.208 | 2.554 | < 0.01 |
HF readmission | 1.304 | 0.803 | 2.117 | 0.28 |
Stroke | 1.057 | 0.371 | 3.014 | 0.92 |
Nonfatal MI | 1.790 | 0.875 | 3.661 | 0.11 |



STEMI performance indicators in the propensity score–matched groups
Quality-of-care indicators | Women | Men | P |
---|---|---|---|
Arrival at PCI-capable hospital in an ambulance | 255 (50.0) | 237 (46.5) | 0.21 |
Direct presentation to PCI-capable hospital | 139 (27.3) | 164 (32.2) | 0.09 |
Reperfusion | 0.50 | ||
Thrombolysis | 105 (20.6) | 106 (20.8) | — |
PPCI < 12 h after symptom onset | 321 (62.9) | 343 (67.3) | — |
PCI 12–24 h after symptom onset | 37 (7.3) | 26 (5.1) | — |
Late STEMI PCI > 24 h after symptom onset | 5 (1.0) | 3 (0.6) | — |
No reperfusion (includes diagnostic angiogram only, and no reperfusion) | 42 (8.2) | 32 (6.3) | — |
Timeliness, h, median (IQR) | |||
Symptom to FMC | 2 (2.75) | 1.3 (2.08) | < 0.001 |
FMC to needle time (if reperfusion = thrombolysis) | 1.8 (2.1) | 1.6 (1.9) | 0.22 |
FMC to balloon time (if reperfusion = PPCI at < 12 h) | 2.4 (1.9) | 2.3 (1.7) | 0.06 |
Door to balloon time (if reperfusion = PPCI at < 12 h) | 1.3 (0.8) | 1.2 (0.7) | 0.06 |
Timely thrombolysis | 12/103 (11.7) | 15/106 (14.2) | 0.59 |
Timely PPCI | 63/319 (19.8) | 93/343 (27.1) | 0.02 |
Total ischemic time, h, median (IQR) | |||
For directly presenting patients | 3.3 (3.8) | 2.9 (2.8) | 0.11 |
For transferred-in patients | 5.3 (4.4) | 4.2 (3.4) | < 0.01 |
For patients undergoing reperfusion with PCI (at < 24 h) | (n = 358) | (n = 369) | |
Radial access | 184 (51.4) | 219 (59.4) | 0.07 |
Thrombus aspiration | 146 (40.8) | 166 (45.0) | 0.25 |
Gp2b3a inhibitor use: | 0.68 | ||
Tirofiban | 292 (59.8) | 301 (81.6) | — |
Bivalirudin | 8 (2.2) | 7 (1.9) | — |
Abciximab | 2 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | — |
Eptifibatide | 12 (3.4) | 14 (3.8) | — |
Balloon angioplasty only | 36 (10.1) | 25 (6.8) | 0.11 |
Number of stents implanted | 0.09 | ||
0 | 36 (10.1) | 21 (5.7) | — |
1 | 281 (78.5) | 292 (79.1) | — |
2 | 38 (10.6) | 53 (14.4) | — |
3 | 3 (0.8) | 3 (0.8) | — |
Contrast volume | 154.5 ± 59.5 | 157.5 ± 57.3 | 0.48 |
Ejection fraction, % | 50.3 ± 11.6 | 50.8 ±11.3 | 0.28 |
Medications at discharge | (n = 483) | (n = 499) | |
Aspirin | 466 (96.5) | 493 (98.8) | 0.016 |
Any P2Y12 inhibitor use | 477 (98.8) | 498 (99.8) | 0.052 |
Statin | 479 (99.2) | 497 (99.6) | 0.390 |
Beta-blocker | 298 (61.7) | 313 (62.7) | 0.739 |
ACEI | 143 (29.6) | 152 (30.5) | 0.770 |
ARB | 44 (9.1) | 43/498 (8.6) | 0.794 |
Diuretics | 149/481 (31.0) | 160/498 (32.1) | 0.698 |
Spironolactone | 99/478 (20.7) | 107/496 (21.6) | 0.742 |
Discussion
- Chamie J.
- Mirkin B.
- Gibson C.M.
- Pride Y.B.
- Frederick P.D.
- et al.
- Berger P.B.
- Ellis S.G.
- Holmes D.R.
- et al.
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Funding Sources
Disclosures
Supplementary Material
- Supplementary Material
References
- Escalating ischemic heart disease burden among women in India: insights from GBD, NCDRisC and NFHS reports.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020; 2: 100035
- Gender differences in presentation, management and inhospital outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from 5000 patients included in the ORBI prospective French regional registry.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 107: 291-298
- Excess mortality in women compared to men after PCI in STEMI: an analysis of 11,931 patients during 2000–2009.Int J Cardiol. 2014; 176: 456-463
- Association between gender, process of care measures, and outcomes in ACS in India: results from the Detection and Management of Coronary Heart Disease (DEMAT) Registry.PLoS One. 2013; 8e62061
- Sex differences in the presentation, diagnosis, and management of acute coronary syndromes: findings from the Kerala-India ACS Registry.Glob Heart. 2015; 10: 273-280
- Women's cardiovascular health in India.Heart. 2012; 98: 456-459
- Gender differences in the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: one year results from HPIAR (HP-India ACS Registry).Int J Cardiol. 2017; 248: 1-6
- Human development reports.(Available at:)http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-giiDate accessed: June 5, 2021
- Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in India (CREATE): a prospective analysis of registry data.Lancet. 2008; 371: 1435-1442
- Presentation, management, and outcomes of 25,748 acute coronary syndrome admissions in Kerala, India: results from the Kerala ACS Registry.Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 121-129
- The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 344-349
- Global perspective on acute coronary syndrome.Circ Res. 2014; 114: 1959-1975
- India’s population: becoming number one.(Available at:)https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/indias-population-becoming-number-oneDate accessed: June 3, 2021
- Risk factors for early myocardial infarction in South Asians compared with individuals in other countries.JAMA. 2007; 297: 286-294
- Sex differences in short-term and long-term all-cause mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention: a meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1822-1830
- Gender-related differences in outcome after BMS or DES implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty: insights from the DESERT cooperation.Atherosclerosis. 2013; 230: 12-16
- Gender-related difference in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a single-centre 6-year registry.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19: 233-240
- Sex differences in outcomes after STEMI: effect modification by treatment strategy and age.JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 632-639
- Association between smoking status and outcomes in myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 6466
- Sex differences persist in time to presentation, revascularization, and mortality in myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8e012161
- Delayed care and mortality among women and men with myocardial infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6e005968
- Is the difference in outcome between men and women treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention age dependent? Gender difference in STEMI stratified on age.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013; 2: 334-341
- Sex differences in reperfusion in young patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO study.Circulation. 2015; 131: 1324-1332
- Comparisons of characteristics and outcomes among women and men with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy.JAMA. 1996; 275: 777-782
- Gender differences in long-term outcome after primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82: 379-384
- Gender differences in short- and long-term mortality in the Vienna STEMI registry.Int J Cardiol. 2017; 244: 303-308
- Gender disparities in first medical contact and delay in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre Swedish survey study.BMJ Open. 2018; 8e020211
- Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006.Am Heart J. 2008; 156: 1035-1044
- Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study.BMJ. 2009; 338: b1807
- Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) Trial.Circulation. 1999; 100: 14-20
- Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 46: 2180-2186
- Association between timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.JAMA. 2010; 303: 2148-2155
- Gender differences in patient and system delay for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: current trends in a Swiss ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction population.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019; 8: 283-290
- Influence of gender on delays and early mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insight from the first French Metaregistry, 2005-2012 patient-level pooled analysis.Int J Cardiol. 2018; 262: 1-8
- Evaluation of gender differences in door-to-balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Heart Lung Circ. 2013; 22: 861-869
- Causes of delay in door-to-balloon time in South-East Asian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.PLoS One. 2017; 12e0185186
- Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial infarction.Circulation. 2008; 118: 2803-2810
- Protocol for a prospective, controlled study of assertive and timely reperfusion for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Tamil Nadu: the TN-STEMI programme.BMJ Open. 2013; 3e003850
- Physical activity and exercise performance predict long-term prognosis in middle-aged women surviving acute coronary syndrome.J Intern Med. 2007; 261: 178-187
- Prognostic value of frailty in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Geriatr. 2019; 19: 222
- Emergency department bypass for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients identified with a prehospital electrocardiogram.Circulation. 2013; 128: 352-359
- Pre-hospital acute coronary syndrome care in Kerala, India: a qualitative analysis.Indian Heart J. 2017; 69: 93-100
- 4-step protocol for disparities in STEMI care and outcomes in women.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71: 2122-2132
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Ethics Statement: We obtained informed consent from all patients. For patients deemed too sick to provide consent, we obtained permission from a patient representative. We adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting results of observational studies. The study was approved by the CSI Kerala Central Ethics Committee, as well as individual hospital ethics committees, where applicable.
See page S78 for disclosure information.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy