Advertisement
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis|Articles in Press

Bedside physical examination for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open AccessPublished:February 26, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.02.007

      Abstract

      Background

      Patients with obstruction to the left ventricular outflow tract from degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) usually do not become symptomatic until their disease becomes graded as severe. We sought to assess the accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of AS of at least moderate severity.

      Methods

      A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and cohorts of patients who received a cardiovascular physical examination prior to receiving a left heart catheterization or an echocardiogram.PubMed, Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase were searched form inception through December 10, 2021, without language restrictions.

      Results

      Our systematic review yielded seven observational studies with adequate data to perform a meta-analysis on three physical examination maneuvers. The presence of auscultating a diminished second heart sound (S2) (LR = 10.87, 95% CI, 3.94 – 30.12, P<.05) and palpating a delayed carotid upstroke (LR = 9.04, 95% CI, 3.12 -25.44, P<.05 are useful for detecting AS of at least moderate severity. The absence of a systolic murmur radiating to the neck, (LR = 0.11, 95% CI, 0.06 – 0.23, P<.05) rules against AS of at least moderate severity.

      Conclusion

      Low quality evidence from observational studies support a diminished S2 and a delayed carotid upstroke as having moderate accuracy in diagnosing the presence of AS of at least moderate severity, while the absence of a murmur radiating to the neck is equally accurate in excluding this diagnosis.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Degenerative valvular heart diseases such as aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation are now much more common than rheumatic heart disease in many countries worldwide.
      • Iung B
      • Vahanian A
      Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult.
      As valvular degeneration of the aortic valve leads to stenosis, the progressive increase in the obstruction to the left ventricular outflow tract can result in a decline in cardiac output, impaired exercise tolerance, and congestive heart failure (CHF).
      • Otto CM
      • Prendergast B
      Aortic-valve stenosis--from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction.
      AS is graded from mild to moderate and finally to severe by this progression of the degree of valvular obstruction.
      • Nishimura RA
      • Otto CM
      • Bonow RO
      • et al.
      2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
      The importance of clinical symptoms are paramount as they are the strongest marker of mortality in patients with AS, with a 50% two-year mortality without valve replacement with the development of syncope, chest pain or CHF.
      • Makkar RR
      • Fontana GP
      • Jilaihawi H
      • et al.
      Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Kodali SK
      • Williams MR
      • Smith CR
      • et al.
      Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.
      Asymptomatic patients with severe AS have also been shown to have an increased risk of sudden death.
      • Otto CM
      • Burwash IG
      • Legget ME
      • et al.
      Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome.
      • Rosenhek R
      • Binder T
      • Porenta G
      • et al.
      Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.
      • Pellikka PA
      • Sarano ME
      • Nishimura RA
      • et al.
      Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.
      • Saito T
      • Muro T
      • Takeda H
      • et al.
      Prognostic value of aortic valve area index in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.
      Unfortunately many of these asymptomatic patients remain undetected as most patients are not diagnosed with AS until they present with symptoms.
      • Frey N
      • Steeds RP
      • Serra A
      • et al.
      Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE).
      The prevalence of AS increases steeply with advancing years of life, with only 0.2% in age 50-59 contrasted by 9.8% in those over 80 years old.
      • Otto CM
      • Prendergast B
      Aortic-valve stenosis--from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction.
      In the United States (US), there are approximately 1.5 million people diagnosed with AS, of which 500,000 have severe aortic stenosis.

      Health JM. U.S. Aortic Stenosis Disease Prevalence & Treatment Statistics. https://www.johnmuirhealth.com/services/cardiovascular-services/intervention/transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement/facts-and-figures.html. Published 2022. Accessed April 25, 2022.

      Unfortunately, only one half of these severe aortic stenosis cases are noted to be symptomatic.

      Health JM. U.S. Aortic Stenosis Disease Prevalence & Treatment Statistics. https://www.johnmuirhealth.com/services/cardiovascular-services/intervention/transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement/facts-and-figures.html. Published 2022. Accessed April 25, 2022.

      The natural history of AS is one in which patients are generally unaware of their condition until they develop symptoms, which portends a four-fold increase in mortality.
      • Iivanainen AM
      • Lindroos M
      • Tilvis R
      • Heikkilä J
      • Kupari M
      Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly.
      Mounting evidence exists for the clinical benefit of early intervention in asymptomatic severe AS, emphasizing the importance of early and accurate detection.
      • Leon MB
      • Mack MJ
      • Hahn RT
      • et al.
      Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.
      • Çelik M
      • Milojevic M
      • Durko AP
      • Oei FBS
      • Mahtab EAF
      • Bogers A
      Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Intervention.
      • Lee SA
      • Kang DH
      Timing of Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
      Physical examination findings have a long history in the diagnosis of aortic stenosis with the murmur first being described by James Hope in 1832.
      • Vaslef SN
      • Roberts WC
      Early descriptions of aortic valve stenosis.
      Evaluation of the precordial impulse, cardiac auscultation, and characteristics of carotid impulse are longstanding approaches for diagnosing aortic stenosis using physical exam. With the rapid technological advances in the treatment of aortic stenosis combined with the curative nature of an aortic valve replacement (AVR), there is a clear importance of early and accurate detection of AS. Given the lack of evidence to support any benefit from medical treatment to alter the progression of AS, an approach to identify patients in need of a valve replacement could improve outcomes as well as costs. We performed our systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the most accurate physical examination findings for detection of AS of least moderate severity.

      Methods

      Protocol and registration

      We have registered our systematic review and meta-analysis through PROSPERO (CRD42022312606). Our study is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guideline.
      • Moher D
      • Liberati A
      • Tetzlaff J
      • Altman DG
      Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

      Data sources, search strategy, study selection, and eligibility criteria

      Our search strategies were established by using Medical subject heading (MESH) terms and text words and search terms which were selected based on common indexing practices and tested repeatedly to capture all potentially relevant studies. PubMed, Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase were searched by two authors (SC and RS) from inception through March 10, 2022, without language restrictions. Additional studies were found by author and reference tracking.
      After removing duplicates, two investigators (SC and RS) screened titles and abstracts for eligibility criteria. Full text reviews were performed on studies which contained data on patients having a cardiac physical examination prior to having an echocardiogram or a left heart catheterization as the reference standard. Consensus was achieved for all phases of study selection and any disagreements were reconciled by discussion.
      Inclusion criteria were prospective or retrospective observational studies in which patients received a cardiac physical examination prior to receiving diagnostic confirmation by using a reference standard imaging test. We accepted an echocardiogram as well as a left heart catheterization as a gold standard diagnostic imaging test for aortic stenosis. Exclusion criteria included: studies that did not record physical examination findings that were blinded to the results of the reference standard confirmatory diagnostic test; studies that did not confirm the physical examination with a reference standard; studies who did not report the number of patients in the study group or only reported in percentages or likelihood ratios.

      Data extraction and Quality Assessment

      Studies which met inclusion criteria were then selected for data extraction and statistical analysis. Study characteristics were identified and included: study description; patient demographics; percentage of patients with moderate and severe AS; physical examination maneuvers studied; and details of the reference standard confirmatory diagnostic test (Table 1). Two investigators independently assessed the quality and risk of bias of all included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool for the Observational, Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies available from the National Institute of Health.

      Institute OHR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonramdmised studies in meta-analysis, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Published 2022. Accessed April 15, 2022.

      The certainty of evidence was evaluated for each study by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment
      • Guyatt G
      • Oxman AD
      • Akl EA
      • et al.
      GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
      Table 1Study Characteristics
      First Author, year of publicationType of studyNumber of patientsMean agePercent malePercent with Moderate (A) and Severe (B) ASPhysical examination tests studiesReference standard
      Forsell 1985
      • Forssell G
      • Jonasson R
      • Orinius E
      Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
      Prospective cohort67Not reportedNot reportedA. 25

      B. 75
      Delayed carotid upstrokeLeft heart catheterization
      Nakamura 1985
      • Nakamura T
      • Hultgren HN
      • Shettigar UR
      • Fowles RE
      Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.
      Prospective cohort536353%A. 40

      B. 60
      Diminished S2Left Heart Catheterization
      Hoagland, 1986
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      Retrospective2316412%A. 6

      B. 21
      Diminished S2

      Delayed Carotid Upstroke

      Murmur radiating to the carotid
      Echocardiography and Left Heart Catheterization
      Aronow, 1987
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      Prospective cohort758221%A. 19

      B. 5
      Diminished S2

      Delayed Carotid upstroke

      Murmur radiating to the neck
      Echocardiography
      Etchells, 1998
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      Prospective cohort22668 (median)58%A. 6.5

      B. 6.5
      Diminished S2

      Delayed Carotid Upstroke

      Murmur radiating to the neck
      Echocardiography
      Abe, 2013
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      Prospective cohort1307442%A. 44

      B. 21
      Diminished S2

      Delayed Carotid upstroke

      Murmur radiating to the neck

      Late peaking Systolic ejection murmur
      Echocardiography
      Gamaza-Chulián, 2020
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      Prospective Cohort867752%A.43

      B.37
      Diminished S2Echocardiography

      Data analysis and synthesis of results

      Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient studies were available to pool sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios for each of the different measures. Table 1 outlines the study characteristics of the included studies for the four physical examination findings for which we have collected data. Meta-analyses of studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic modalities generally employ bivariate methods that model both simultaneously. We have included Forest plots showing the values of these statistics for individual studies. Pooling of the results are illustrated using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curves (Supplemental Figure S1). Diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) are also presented using traditional univariate meta-analysis methods. Either the random effects or fixed effects pooling methods were employed, depending on the value of the I2 statistic. Outlier studies were deleted, and the analysis was revised when funnel plots suggested the potential for publication bias (Supplemental Figure S2). Analysis was performed using the meta and mada packages in R as well as the metandi (Habord & Whiting, 2009) module for Stata.
      • Balduzzi S
      • Rücker G
      • Schwarzer G
      How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.

      Doebler P. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy. R package version 0.5.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada. Published 2020. Accessed April 8, 2022.

      Habord RaW, P. . metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata Journal. 2009;9(2):211-299.

      Role of Funding Sources and Ethical Approval

      This study did not receive any funding. The Institutional Review Board at Trinity Health Ann Arbor Hospital deemed this project to be exempt from ethical approval.

      Results

      After screening 3822 titles and abstracts, 44 studies were selected for full text review (Figure 1). Seven studies met inclusion criteria and had data extracted for statistical analysis from a total of 868 patients (Table 1).
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      • Forssell G
      • Jonasson R
      • Orinius E
      Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
      • Nakamura T
      • Hultgren HN
      • Shettigar UR
      • Fowles RE
      Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.
      We were able to collect data for four physical examination findings and will review each evaluation separately.

      Delayed Carotid Upstroke

      There were six studies with 815 patients which evaluated a delayed carotid upstroke to assist in the diagnosis of aortic stenosis.
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      • Forssell G
      • Jonasson R
      • Orinius E
      Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
      The summary of pooled meta-analysis data for the delayed carotid upstroke in regard to sensitivity, specificity and LRs are reported in Table 2. Univariate analysis was conducted for DOR employing a random effects pooling method due to the moderate heterogeneity of studies. The pooled odds ratio based on all six studies is large and significant, 13.81 (95% CI, 6.85 - 27.83) (Figure 2). Two studies (Aronow, 1987
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      and Gamaza-Chulian, 2020
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      ) were identified as having particularly large odds ratios and may be introducing publication bias. The analysis was performed without the outliers, and the remaining four studies still produced a large and significant pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 11.06 (95% CI, 5.62 - 21.75)(Table 2). We identified only one study reporting interobserver reliability for this physical examination finding, which was a kappa score of 0.26.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      Table 2Sensitivity, Specificity and Likelihood Ratios (LR) for Aortic Stenosis Physical Examination Findings
      Physical Examination findingSensitivitySpecificityPositive LRNegative LR
      Diminished S20.59 (95% CI, 0.44 - 0.72, P<.0001)0.95 (95% CI, 0.85 - 0.98, P<.0001)10.87 (95% CI, 3.94 – 30.12, P<.05)0.44 (95% CI, 0.31 - 0.61, P<.05)
      Delayed Carotid Upstroke0.57 (95% CI, 0.37 - 0.75, P<.0001)0.94 (95% CI, 0.81 - 0.98, P<.0001)9.04 (95% CI, 3.12 -25.44, P<.05)0.46 (95% CI, 0.30 -0.71, P<.05)
      Systolic Murmur Radiating to the Neck0.93 (95% CI, 0.81- 0.97, P<.0001)0.66 (95% CI, 0.41 - 0.84, P<.0001)2.69 (95% CI 1.48 – 4.89,P<.05)0.11 (95% CI, 0.06 – 0.23, P<.05)
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Diagnostic odds ratios for physical examination findings in the diagnosis of moderate AS meta–analysis.

      Diminished second heart sound (S2)

      Six studies with 801 patients reported data on the diminished intensity of S2.
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      ,
      • Nakamura T
      • Hultgren HN
      • Shettigar UR
      • Fowles RE
      Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.
      Pooled sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LR) are reported in Table 2. There is also a moderate amount of heterogeneity between studies; therefore, DORs were calculated using the random effects pooling method. The pooled odds ratio is large and significant, 16.39 (95% CI, 7.85 - 34.20)(Figure 2). The funnel plot indicates the possibility of publication bias; therefore, the studies that generated the two largest odds ratios (Aronow, 1987
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      and Gamaza-Chulian 2020
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      ) were excluded and the pooled odds ratio for the remaining three studies was smaller but still significant (DOR = 11.86, 95% CI, 6.67 - 21.08). In searching for data on interobserver reliability for this physical sign, we found only one study which reported a kappa score of 0.54.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.

      Systolic Murmur Radiating to the Neck

      We report data from four studies with 662 patients which evaluated patients for the presence of a systolic murmur radiating to the neck for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis.
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      Once again, significant between-study variability exists. Unlike the prior two measures, whose specificities exceeded their sensitivities, murmur radiating to the neck is more sensitive and less specific (Table 2). There was minimal between-study heterogeneity and therefore the fixed effects model was employed. The pooled odds ratio was large and significant, (DOR = 23.03, 95% CI 12.08 - 43.92, P <.05)(Figure 2). The funnel plot did not reveal evidence of bias from large outliers; the study with low precision (Aronow, 1987
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      ) reported the smallest odds ratio. We identified only one study which reported interobserver reliability of this physical examination sign, which was a kappa score of 0.33.
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.

      Late Peaking Systolic Ejection Murmurs

      We found only two studies with 216 patients which we extracted data for a late peaking systolic ejection murmur in the diagnostic evaluation of aortic stenosis.
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      With only two studies available, no bivariate meta-analysis was performed.

      Discussion

      The relevance of the bedside diagnosis of aortic stenosis dates back to at least 1832.
      • Vaslef SN
      • Roberts WC
      Early descriptions of aortic valve stenosis.
      We chose to perform our systematic review and meta-analysis due to the importance of early detection of AS in an attempt to improve the unfavorable natural history of this degenerative valvular heart disease. To our knowledge, we are the first to perform a systematic review with a meta-analysis on the accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of AS. Our study has identified three physical examination signs which are particularly useful in providing accuracy in the clinical bedside examination for the detection of aortic stenosis of moderate or greater severity. Two of the examination findings we studied have significantly positive LR, thus are accurate to help rule in the presence of AS. The diminished S2 was found to have an LR of 10.87 (95% CI, 3.94 – 30.12, P<.05) and palpating a delayed carotid upstroke had an LR of 9.04 (95% CI, 3.123 -25.435, P<.05)(Table 2). One physical examination finding was very good a discriminating against the diagnosis of AS, a systolic murmur radiating to the neck, which had a LR of 0.11 (95% CI, 0.056 – 0.232, P<.05)(Table 2). Thus, the absence of hearing a systolic murmur radiating to the neck is very accurate in helping to rule out AS. These data provide moderate support for the accuracy of the physical examination to diagnose AS of at least moderate severity. These interpretations of the use of LR are supported by McGee, who has explained a LR of 10 increased the probability by 45% of a disease or condition being present when a test or sign being positive or present, thus having a moderative positive predictive value.
      • McGee S
      Simplifying likelihood ratios.
      ,

      Mcgee S. Evidence-based Physical Diagnosis. . 4 ed: Elsevier Saunders; 2017.

      Conversely an LR of 0.1 decreases the probability by 45% of a disease or condition being present in the absence of that test or sign, thus having moderate negative predictive value.
      • McGee S
      Simplifying likelihood ratios.
      ,

      Mcgee S. Evidence-based Physical Diagnosis. . 4 ed: Elsevier Saunders; 2017.

      Our study was designed to identifying the most accurate physical examination maneuvers in evaluating patients with a systolic heart murmur in patients suspected of having AS. We fully recognize that several other physical signs should also be used when evaluating patients with systolic murmurs. Several physical signs which historically have been studied in the diagnosis of AS were identified in our systematic review; however, did not have enough data to be included in our meta-analysis. A palpable delay between the apical and carotid impulse has an excellent negative predictive value (LR of 0.05) in only one study.
      • Chun PK
      • Dunn BE
      Clinical clue of severe aortic stenosis. Simultaneous palpation of the carotid and apical impulses.
      The brachioradial delay has similarly excellent negative predictive value (LR of 0.04) also in only one study.
      • Leach RM
      • McBrien DJ
      Brachioradial delay: a new clinical indicator of the severity of aortic stenosis.
      Finding a sustained apical impulse has modest positive predictive value (LR of 4.1).
      • Forssell G
      • Jonasson R
      • Orinius E
      Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
      A late peaking murmur has the best diagnostic evidence of any of the murmur characteristics which have been studied. Data from a small sample size from four studies revealed modest positive predictive value when this sign is present (LR of 3.7) as well as modest negative predictive value in its absence (LR = 0.2).
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      ,
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • McGee S
      Etiology and diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults.
      The fourth heart sound has not been shown to have significant diagnostic value for evaluating suspected AS.
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      ,
      • Kavalier MA
      • Stewart J
      • Tavel ME
      The apical A wave versus the fourth heart sound in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.
      We believe our study has identified the most accurate physical examination findings which would be useful to include in the assessment of patients with systolic heart murmurs. Our systematic review and meta-analysis introduces data which to our knowledge, has not been presented elsewhere. Clinical implications for an accurate physical examination to enhance the early diagnosis of AS may include more expedient implementation of AVR which may decrease both disease burden and associated costs, and most importantly lead to lower morbidity and mortality.
      • Leon MB
      • Mack MJ
      • Hahn RT
      • et al.
      Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.
      • Çelik M
      • Milojevic M
      • Durko AP
      • Oei FBS
      • Mahtab EAF
      • Bogers A
      Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Intervention.
      • Lee SA
      • Kang DH
      Timing of Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
      ,
      • Moore M
      • Chen J
      • Mallow PJ
      • Rizzo JA
      The direct health-care burden of valvular heart disease: evidence from US national survey data.
      There are several limitations to our study. We only identified eight studies which matched our eligibility criteria. In five of the studies, the sample size was less than 100, in the other three, the largest sample size was 231 (Table 1). Risk of bias was moderate to high in all the selected studies (Table 3). Selection bias was high as none of the studies had a control group for comparison and most of the case series or cohorts were comprised of patients with known AS. Independence between the findings of the physical examination and the results of the reference standard test occurred in four of the eight studies, which invites the possibility of bias in the reporting of outcomes.
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      ,
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      There was only one study we identified which reported on the interobserver reliability on the three physical examination findings in our meta-analysis. We have identified age as a possible confounder for the physical finding of a delayed carotid upstroke as transmission velocity of the carotid pulse has shown to be higher in older compared with younger study subjects .
      • Portaluppi F
      • Knighten V
      • Luisada AA
      Transmission delays of different portions of the arterial pulse. A comparison between the indirect aortic and carotid pulse tracings.
      Since AS has a higher prevalence with increasing age, studies with age matched control patients without AS could shed more light on the effects of age on the carotid upstroke. There was moderate heterogeneity in the meta-analyses of the delayed carotid upstroke and the diminished intensity of S2, which means the results of the studies for these findings had a moderate degree of variability. The meta-analysis for murmur radiating to neck had low heterogeneity and was the best estimate of a true single effect size in our study. And finally, due to the nature of all our studies being observational the quality of evidence using the GRADE assessment is low.
      • Guyatt G
      • Oxman AD
      • Akl EA
      • et al.
      GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
      Table 3Modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scorea
      StudySelectionComparability of cases and controlsIndependent blind assessment of outcome
      Representativeness of cases or cohort is consecutive or a series of casesSelection of controls are from the community
      Forsell et al, 19853
      • Forssell G
      • Jonasson R
      • Orinius E
      Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
      1000
      Nakamura et al, 1985
      • Nakamura T
      • Hultgren HN
      • Shettigar UR
      • Fowles RE
      Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.
      1000
      Hoagland et al, 1986
      • Hoagland PM
      • Cook EF
      • Wynne J
      • Goldman L
      Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
      1001
      Aronow et al, 1987
      • Aronow WS
      • Kronzon I
      Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
      1000
      Etchells et al, 1998
      • Etchells E
      • Glenns V
      • Shadowitz S
      • Bell C
      • Siu S
      A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
      1001
      Abe et al, 2013
      • Abe Y
      • Ito M
      • Tanaka C
      • et al.
      A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
      1001
      Gamaza-Chulián et al, 2020
      • Gamaza-Chulián S
      • Serrano-Muñoz B
      • Díaz-Retamino E
      • et al.
      Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
      1001
      a) A score of 0 is equal to a high risk of bias and a score of 1 signifies a low risk of bias.
      In conclusion, our review of eight studies which included a total of 951 patients, we found low quality evidence for the physical examination findings for both positive and negative prediction for the presence and absence of aortic stenosis of at least moderate severity. The finding of a diminished S2 and a delayed carotid upstroke provide modest improvement in the pretest probability that a patient has moderate or greater severity aortic stenosis when evaluating systolic heart murmurs. The absence of a murmur radiating to the neck provides modest improvement on the post-test probability that a patient does not have at least moderate aortic stenosis. Further high-quality studies with control patients in carefully matched cohorts are necessary to shed more light on the accuracy of the physical examination in enhancing the early detection of aortic stenosis.

      Supplementary Material

      References:

        • Iung B
        • Vahanian A
        Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult.
        Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011; 8: 162-172
        • Otto CM
        • Prendergast B
        Aortic-valve stenosis--from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2014; 371: 744-756
        • Nishimura RA
        • Otto CM
        • Bonow RO
        • et al.
        2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 63: e57-185
        • Makkar RR
        • Fontana GP
        • Jilaihawi H
        • et al.
        Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2012; 366: 1696-1704
        • Kodali SK
        • Williams MR
        • Smith CR
        • et al.
        Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2012; 366: 1686-1695
        • Otto CM
        • Burwash IG
        • Legget ME
        • et al.
        Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome.
        Circulation. 1997; 95: 2262-2270
        • Rosenhek R
        • Binder T
        • Porenta G
        • et al.
        Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2000; 343: 611-617
        • Pellikka PA
        • Sarano ME
        • Nishimura RA
        • et al.
        Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.
        Circulation. 2005; 111: 3290-3295
        • Saito T
        • Muro T
        • Takeda H
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of aortic valve area index in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.
        The American journal of cardiology. 2012; 110: 93-97
        • Frey N
        • Steeds RP
        • Serra A
        • et al.
        Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE).
        BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017; 17: 5
      1. Health JM. U.S. Aortic Stenosis Disease Prevalence & Treatment Statistics. https://www.johnmuirhealth.com/services/cardiovascular-services/intervention/transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement/facts-and-figures.html. Published 2022. Accessed April 25, 2022.

        • Iivanainen AM
        • Lindroos M
        • Tilvis R
        • Heikkilä J
        • Kupari M
        Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly.
        The American journal of cardiology. 1996; 78: 97-101
        • Leon MB
        • Mack MJ
        • Hahn RT
        • et al.
        Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.
        Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021; 77: 1149-1161
        • Çelik M
        • Milojevic M
        • Durko AP
        • Oei FBS
        • Mahtab EAF
        • Bogers A
        Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Intervention.
        J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021; 8
        • Lee SA
        • Kang DH
        Timing of Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
        Circ J. 2022; 86: 376-382
        • Vaslef SN
        • Roberts WC
        Early descriptions of aortic valve stenosis.
        American heart journal. 1993; 125: 1465-1474
        • Moher D
        • Liberati A
        • Tetzlaff J
        • Altman DG
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        Bmj. 2009; 339: b2535
      2. Institute OHR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonramdmised studies in meta-analysis, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Published 2022. Accessed April 15, 2022.

        • Guyatt G
        • Oxman AD
        • Akl EA
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
        Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011; 64: 383-394
        • Balduzzi S
        • Rücker G
        • Schwarzer G
        How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.
        Evidence-based mental health. 2019; 22: 153-160
      3. Doebler P. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy. R package version 0.5.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada. Published 2020. Accessed April 8, 2022.

      4. Habord RaW, P. . metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata Journal. 2009;9(2):211-299.

        • Hoagland PM
        • Cook EF
        • Wynne J
        • Goldman L
        Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.
        The American journal of medicine. 1986; 80: 1041-1050
        • Etchells E
        • Glenns V
        • Shadowitz S
        • Bell C
        • Siu S
        A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
        Journal of general internal medicine. 1998; 13: 699-704
        • Aronow WS
        • Kronzon I
        Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.
        The American journal of cardiology. 1987; 60: 399-401
        • Abe Y
        • Ito M
        • Tanaka C
        • et al.
        A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26: 589-596
        • Gamaza-Chulián S
        • Serrano-Muñoz B
        • Díaz-Retamino E
        • et al.
        Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.
        REC: CardioClinics. 2020; 55: 139-146
        • Forssell G
        • Jonasson R
        • Orinius E
        Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.
        Acta Med Scand. 1985; 218: 397-400
        • Nakamura T
        • Hultgren HN
        • Shettigar UR
        • Fowles RE
        Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.
        American heart journal. 1984; 107: 959-966
        • McGee S
        Simplifying likelihood ratios.
        Journal of general internal medicine. 2002; 17: 646-649
      5. Mcgee S. Evidence-based Physical Diagnosis. . 4 ed: Elsevier Saunders; 2017.

        • Chun PK
        • Dunn BE
        Clinical clue of severe aortic stenosis. Simultaneous palpation of the carotid and apical impulses.
        Archives of internal medicine. 1982; 142: 2284-2288
        • Leach RM
        • McBrien DJ
        Brachioradial delay: a new clinical indicator of the severity of aortic stenosis.
        Lancet. 1990; 335: 1199-1201
        • McGee S
        Etiology and diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults.
        The American journal of medicine. 2010; 123: 913-921.e911
        • Kavalier MA
        • Stewart J
        • Tavel ME
        The apical A wave versus the fourth heart sound in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.
        Circulation. 1975; 51: 324-327
        • Moore M
        • Chen J
        • Mallow PJ
        • Rizzo JA
        The direct health-care burden of valvular heart disease: evidence from US national survey data.
        Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8: 613-627
        • Portaluppi F
        • Knighten V
        • Luisada AA
        Transmission delays of different portions of the arterial pulse. A comparison between the indirect aortic and carotid pulse tracings.
        Acta Cardiol. 1983; 38: 49-59