Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
Introduction
Methods
Protocol and registration
Data sources, search strategy, study selection, and eligibility criteria
Data extraction and Quality Assessment
First Author, year of publication | Type of study | Number of patients | Mean age | Percent male | Percent with Moderate (A) and Severe (B) AS | Physical examination tests studies | Reference standard |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forsell 1985 28 | Prospective cohort | 67 | Not reported | Not reported | A. 25 B. 75 | Delayed carotid upstroke | Left heart catheterization |
Nakamura 1985 29 | Prospective cohort | 53 | 63 | 53% | A. 40 B. 60 | Diminished S2 | Left Heart Catheterization |
Hoagland, 1986 23 | Retrospective | 231 | 64 | 12% | A. 6 B. 21 | Diminished S2 Delayed Carotid Upstroke Murmur radiating to the carotid | Echocardiography and Left Heart Catheterization |
Aronow, 1987 25
Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs. The American journal of cardiology. 1987; 60: 399-401 | Prospective cohort | 75 | 82 | 21% | A. 19 B. 5 | Diminished S2 Delayed Carotid upstroke Murmur radiating to the neck | Echocardiography |
Etchells, 1998 24 | Prospective cohort | 226 | 68 (median) | 58% | A. 6.5 B. 6.5 | Diminished S2 Delayed Carotid Upstroke Murmur radiating to the neck | Echocardiography |
Abe, 2013 26 | Prospective cohort | 130 | 74 | 42% | A. 44 B. 21 | Diminished S2 Delayed Carotid upstroke Murmur radiating to the neck Late peaking Systolic ejection murmur | Echocardiography |
Gamaza-Chulián, 2020 27 | Prospective Cohort | 86 | 77 | 52% | A.43 B.37 | Diminished S2 | Echocardiography |
Data analysis and synthesis of results
Role of Funding Sources and Ethical Approval
Results
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I

Delayed Carotid Upstroke
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
Physical Examination finding | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive LR | Negative LR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diminished S2 | 0.59 (95% CI, 0.44 - 0.72, P<.0001) | 0.95 (95% CI, 0.85 - 0.98, P<.0001) | 10.87 (95% CI, 3.94 – 30.12, P<.05) | 0.44 (95% CI, 0.31 - 0.61, P<.05) |
Delayed Carotid Upstroke | 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37 - 0.75, P<.0001) | 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81 - 0.98, P<.0001) | 9.04 (95% CI, 3.12 -25.44, P<.05) | 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30 -0.71, P<.05) |
Systolic Murmur Radiating to the Neck | 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81- 0.97, P<.0001) | 0.66 (95% CI, 0.41 - 0.84, P<.0001) | 2.69 (95% CI 1.48 – 4.89,P<.05) | 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06 – 0.23, P<.05) |

Diminished second heart sound (S2)
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
Systolic Murmur Radiating to the Neck
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
Late Peaking Systolic Ejection Murmurs
Discussion
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
- Aronow WS
- Kronzon I
Study | Selection | Comparability of cases and controls | Independent blind assessment of outcome | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of cases or cohort is consecutive or a series of cases | Selection of controls are from the community | |||
Forsell et al, 19853 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nakamura et al, 1985 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hoagland et al, 1986 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Aronow et al, 1987 25
Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs. The American journal of cardiology. 1987; 60: 399-401 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Etchells et al, 1998 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Abe et al, 2013 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Gamaza-Chulián et al, 2020 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Supplementary Material
References:
- Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011; 8: 162-172
- Aortic-valve stenosis--from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction.The New England journal of medicine. 2014; 371: 744-756
- 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 63: e57-185
- Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis.The New England journal of medicine. 2012; 366: 1696-1704
- Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.The New England journal of medicine. 2012; 366: 1686-1695
- Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome.Circulation. 1997; 95: 2262-2270
- Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.The New England journal of medicine. 2000; 343: 611-617
- Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.Circulation. 2005; 111: 3290-3295
- Prognostic value of aortic valve area index in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.The American journal of cardiology. 2012; 110: 93-97
- Quality of care assessment and improvement in aortic stenosis - rationale and design of a multicentre registry (IMPULSE).BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017; 17: 5
Health JM. U.S. Aortic Stenosis Disease Prevalence & Treatment Statistics. https://www.johnmuirhealth.com/services/cardiovascular-services/intervention/transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement/facts-and-figures.html. Published 2022. Accessed April 25, 2022.
- Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly.The American journal of cardiology. 1996; 78: 97-101
- Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021; 77: 1149-1161
- Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and the Impact of Intervention.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021; 8
- Timing of Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.Circ J. 2022; 86: 376-382
- Early descriptions of aortic valve stenosis.American heart journal. 1993; 125: 1465-1474
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.Bmj. 2009; 339: b2535
Institute OHR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonramdmised studies in meta-analysis, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Published 2022. Accessed April 15, 2022.
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011; 64: 383-394
- How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.Evidence-based mental health. 2019; 22: 153-160
Doebler P. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy. R package version 0.5.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada. Published 2020. Accessed April 8, 2022.
Habord RaW, P. . metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata Journal. 2009;9(2):211-299.
- Value of noninvasive testing in adults with suspected aortic stenosis.The American journal of medicine. 1986; 80: 1041-1050
- A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.Journal of general internal medicine. 1998; 13: 699-704
- Correlation of prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of aortic stenosis in patients aged 62 to 100 years with aortic systolic ejection murmurs.The American journal of cardiology. 1987; 60: 399-401
- A novel and simple method using pocket-sized echocardiography to screen for aortic stenosis.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26: 589-596
- Physical examination in aortic stenosis. Correlation with echocardiographic and peripheral Doppler echocardiography findings.REC: CardioClinics. 2020; 55: 139-146
- Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination.Acta Med Scand. 1985; 218: 397-400
- Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.American heart journal. 1984; 107: 959-966
- Simplifying likelihood ratios.Journal of general internal medicine. 2002; 17: 646-649
Mcgee S. Evidence-based Physical Diagnosis. . 4 ed: Elsevier Saunders; 2017.
- Clinical clue of severe aortic stenosis. Simultaneous palpation of the carotid and apical impulses.Archives of internal medicine. 1982; 142: 2284-2288
- Brachioradial delay: a new clinical indicator of the severity of aortic stenosis.Lancet. 1990; 335: 1199-1201
- Etiology and diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults.The American journal of medicine. 2010; 123: 913-921.e911
- The apical A wave versus the fourth heart sound in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.Circulation. 1975; 51: 324-327
- The direct health-care burden of valvular heart disease: evidence from US national survey data.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8: 613-627
- Transmission delays of different portions of the arterial pulse. A comparison between the indirect aortic and carotid pulse tracings.Acta Cardiol. 1983; 38: 49-59
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Acknowledgements:
None
Declaration of Interest Statement
None of the authors have any competing interests to report. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest or ant financial disclosures.
Statement of authorship
Richard A Shellenberger, DO participated in the study design, development of methods, data base search, study selection and writing the manuscript.
Stephanie Crass, DO participated in the study design, development of methods, data base search, study selection and writing the manuscript.
Justin Jevicks, DO participated in the study design, development of methods, data base search, study selection and writing the manuscript.
Ankita Badhwar, DO participated in the study design, development of methods, data base search, study selection and writing the manuscript.
Jeremy Albright participated in the statistical analysis, data synthesis, writing of the methods section and creating statistical figures.
Agara Kumar, MD participated in the study design, data collection, study selection, and the writing of the manuscript
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy