Advertisement
Original Article|Articles in Press

VALIDATION OF A CASE DEFINITION TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN CANADIAN PRIMARY CARE PRACTICES

Open AccessPublished:April 21, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.04.003

      Abstract

      Background

      Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally. This study validates a primary care-based electronic medical record (EMR) case definition for CVD.

      Methods

      This retrospective cross-sectional study explores EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). A reference standard was created by reviewing medical records of a subset of CPCSSN patients (n=2,017) for coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Together these produced a CVD reference. We applied validated case definitions to an active patient population (≥1 visit between 1-Jan-2018 and 31-Dec-2019) to estimate prevalence using exact binomial test (N=689,301). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared and t-tests characterized patients with and without CVD.

      Results

      The optimal CVD case definition 2 had a sensitivity 68.5% (61.6-74.8%), specificity 97.8% (97.0-98.4%), positive predictive value (PPV) 77.7% (71.6-82.7%), and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.5% (95.8-97.1%). Included in this CVD definition was a strong CAD case definition with sensitivity 91.6% (84.6-96.1%), specificity 98.3% (97.6-98.8%), PPV 74.8% (67.8-80.7%), and NPV 99.5% (99.1-99.7%). This CVD definition also included CeVD and PVD case definitions with low sensitivity (77.6% and 36.6%) but high specificity (98.6% and 99.0%). The estimated prevalence of CVD among primary care patients is 11.2% (CI 11.1-11.3) (n= 77,064), the majority had CAD (6.4%).

      Conclusion

      This study validated a definition of CVD and its component parts CAD, CeVD and PVD. Understanding the prevalence and disease burden for patients with CVD within primary care can improve prevention and disease management.

      Graphical abstract

      Introduction

      Cardiovascular disease (CVD) refers to several conditions that affect blood vessels including coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD).

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      • Bansilal S.
      • Castellano J.M.
      • Fuster V.
      Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      Public Health Agency of Canada. Heart Disease in Canada. 2017. Retrieved online from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-fact-sheet/heart-disease-factsheet-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

      • Manuel D.G.
      • Leung M.
      • Nguyen K.
      • Tanuseputro P.
      • Johansen H.
      Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada.

      Abramson BL, Al-Omran MA, Anand SS, Albalawi Z, Coutinho T, Mestral C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 guidelines for peripheral arterial disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): P560-P587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j/cjca.2022.02.029

      CVD contributes to significant direct and indirect healthcare costs. Globally CVD is the leading cause of mortality and accounts for approximately 30% of all deaths.

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Bansilal S.
      • Castellano J.M.
      • Fuster V.
      Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
      ,

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Most of the mortality associated with CVD relates to deaths from CAD and CeVD (i.e., strokes).

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Bansilal S.
      • Castellano J.M.
      • Fuster V.
      Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
      ,

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      Public Health Agency of Canada. Heart Disease in Canada. 2017. Retrieved online from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-fact-sheet/heart-disease-factsheet-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

      • Manuel D.G.
      • Leung M.
      • Nguyen K.
      • Tanuseputro P.
      • Johansen H.
      Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada.

      Abramson BL, Al-Omran MA, Anand SS, Albalawi Z, Coutinho T, Mestral C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 guidelines for peripheral arterial disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): P560-P587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j/cjca.2022.02.029

      • Malakar A.K.
      • Choudhury D.
      • Halder B.
      • Paul P.
      • Uddin A.
      • Chakraborty S.
      A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors and therapeutics.
      A third of these deaths are considered premature involving individuals under the age of 70 years.

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Bansilal S.
      • Castellano J.M.
      • Fuster V.
      Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
      ,

      Public Health Agency of Canada. Heart Disease in Canada. 2017. Retrieved online from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-fact-sheet/heart-disease-factsheet-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

      Underlying determinants of CVD are linked not only to hereditary factors but also to the social determinants of health

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Bansilal S.
      • Castellano J.M.
      • Fuster V.
      Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
      . Poverty, stress, urbanization, population ageing and globalization are all considered important drivers of CVD.

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      Specifically, patient risk factors for CVD include obesity, comorbidities, health behaviors, family history as well as psychosocial factors.
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,
      • Malakar A.K.
      • Choudhury D.
      • Halder B.
      • Paul P.
      • Uddin A.
      • Chakraborty S.
      A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors and therapeutics.

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      • Akil L.
      • Ahmad H.A.
      Relationships between Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases in Four Southern States and Colorado.
      • Wu C.-Y.
      • Hu H.-Y.
      • Chou Y.-J.
      • Huang N.
      • Chou Y.-C.
      • Li C.-P.
      High Blood Pressure and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortalities in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
      • Lee D.
      • Chiu M.
      • Manuel D.
      • Tu Karen
      • Wang X.
      • Austin P.
      • et al.
      Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Canada: temporal, socio-demographic and geographic factors.
      • Brar R.
      • Katz A.
      • Ferguson T.
      • Whitlock R.H.
      • Nella M.D.
      • Bohm C.
      • Rigatto C.
      • et al.
      Association of membership at a medical fitness facility with adverse health outcomes.
      • Barengo N.C.
      • Antikainen R.
      • Borodulin K.
      • Harald K.
      • Jousilahti P.
      Leisure-time physical activity reduces total and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence in older adults.
      • Nocon M.
      • Hiemann T.
      • M€uller-Riemenschneider F.
      • Thalau F.
      • Roll S.
      • Willich S.N.
      Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
      • O’Donovan G.
      • Lee I.M.
      • Hamer M.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality.
      • Hamer M.
      • Bauman A.
      • Bell J.A.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Examining associations between physical activity and cardiovascular mortality using negative control outcomes.
      • Kosowan L.
      • Shannon S.
      • Rothney J.
      • Halas G.
      • Enns J.
      • Holmqvist M.
      • Wener P.
      • Goertzen L.
      • Katz A.
      Informing the physical activity evaluation framework: A scoping review of reviews.
      These risk factors often interact and amplify the risk of vascular damage leading to CVD morbidity and mortality at younger ages.

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      ,

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      Canadian and international guidelines recommend broad implementation of measures in primary care settings to address CVD and related risk factors.

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      ,

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      Identifying CVD within primary care can support improved prevention, treatment, and management, which in turn can prevent premature mortality.

      World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

      ,
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      ,

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      Efforts have been made to utilize healthcare administrative databases for disease surveillance, however these efforts have not consistently been performed with primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data.

      Cozzolino, F., Abraha, I., Orso, M., Mengoni, A., Cerasa, M.F., Eusebi, P., Ambrosio, G. and Montedori, A. (2017) ‘Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project’, BMJ Open, 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      Although EMR-based case definitions have been validated for several related conditions, CVD case definitions have largely been developed with administrative health data including hospital records.

      Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P.L., Mo, H., Cronin, R.M., Warner, J.L. and Denny, J.C. (2016) ‘Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, pp. 20–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv130 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,

      McBrien, K.A., Souri, S., Symonds, N.E., Rouhi, A., Lethebe, B.C., Williamson, T.S., Garies, S., Birtwhistle, R., Quan, H., Fabreau, G.E. and Ronksley, P.E. (2018) ‘Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, pp. 1567–1578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy094 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      • Tu K.
      • Wang M.
      • Young J.
      • Green D.
      • Ivers N.
      • Butt D.
      • Jaakkimainen L.
      • Kapral M.
      Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
      • Tu K.
      • Mitiku T.
      • Lee D.
      • Guo H.
      • Tu J.
      Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).

      Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson HG, Eschol JO, Kafa R, Girotra S, Winiecki S, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infraction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the sentinel distributed database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398-404. Doi:101002/pds.4398

      • Ahmad F.S.
      • Chan C.
      • Rosenman M.B.
      • Post W.S.
      • Fort D.G.
      • Greenland P.
      • Liu K.J.
      • et al.
      Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
      • Goyal A.
      • Norton C.R.
      • Thomas T.N.
      • Davis R.L.
      • Butler J.
      • Ashok V.
      • Zhao L.
      • et al.
      Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
      • Kivimaki M.
      • Batty G.D.
      • Singh-Manoux A.
      • Britton A.
      • Brunner E.
      • Shipley M.
      Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.

      Finlayson G, Ekuma O, Yogendran M, Burland E, Forget E. The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2010.

      • Lix L.
      • Sobhan S.
      • St-Jean A.
      • Daigle J.M.
      • Fisher A.
      • Yu O.H.
      • et al.
      Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.

      Katz A, Martens P, Chateau D, Bogdanovic B, Koseva I, McDougall C, Boriskewich E. Understanding the Health System Use of Ambulatory Care Patients. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2013.

      Chartier M, Dart A, Tangri N, Komenda P, Walld R, Bogdanovic B, Burchill C, Koseva I, McGowan K-L, Rajotte L. Care of Manitobans Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2015.

      CVD definitions based on administrative health data may lead to underreporting of some CVD presentations that precede hospitalization.

      Bhagirath VC, Nash D, Wan D, Anand SS. Building your peripheral artery disease toolkit: Medical management of peripheral artery disease in 2022. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): 634-644. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2022.02.004

      Sontheimer D L. Peripheral Vascular Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment – American Family Physician [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1971.html

      • Lee D.W.
      • Cavender M.A.
      Guidelines for peripheral vascular disease: where is the evidence?.
      The widespread adoption of EMRs has resulted in the availability of primary care EMR data including information on diseases and their characteristics not currently captured in administrative data sources.

      Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P.L., Mo, H., Cronin, R.M., Warner, J.L. and Denny, J.C. (2016) ‘Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, pp. 20–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv130 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,

      Williamson, T. et al. (2014) ‘Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records’, Annals of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.annfammed.org/content/12/4/367 (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      Primary care EMR data can improve case detection, thereby providing insight into the epidemiology of diseases and inform prevention, management and quality improvement strategies.

      Cozzolino, F., Abraha, I., Orso, M., Mengoni, A., Cerasa, M.F., Eusebi, P., Ambrosio, G. and Montedori, A. (2017) ‘Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project’, BMJ Open, 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,

      McBrien, K.A., Souri, S., Symonds, N.E., Rouhi, A., Lethebe, B.C., Williamson, T.S., Garies, S., Birtwhistle, R., Quan, H., Fabreau, G.E. and Ronksley, P.E. (2018) ‘Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, pp. 1567–1578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy094 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,

      Williamson, T. et al. (2014) ‘Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records’, Annals of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.annfammed.org/content/12/4/367 (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Preventing the Global Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease: Meeting the Challenges in Developing Countries (2010) Fuster V, Kelly BB, editors. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. 4, Measurement and Evaluation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45691/ (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      • Vijh R.
      • Wong S.
      • Grandy M.
      • Peterson S.
      • Ezzat A.M.
      • Gibb A.G.
      • Hawkins N.M.
      Identifying heart failure in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease through the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in British Columbia: a case derivation study.
      EMR-based primary care prevalence estimates can measure efforts to reduce disease burden through identification of patients and an understanding of primary and secondary prevention and treatments.
      Clinical notes, diagnoses, examination results, laboratory data, risk factors, and prescribing practices are all important components of EMR data that have an enormous potential to be used to describe the care of conditions such as CVD.

      Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P.L., Mo, H., Cronin, R.M., Warner, J.L. and Denny, J.C. (2016) ‘Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, pp. 20–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv130 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      We sought to develop, validate, and apply an EMR-based case definition of CVD with the goal of detecting and characterizing patients with CVD in primary care settings. Further, we characterize the prevalence and overlap between the component parts of CVD.

      Materials and methods

      This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed EMR data held in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). On a semi-annual basis, CPCSSN extracts and cleans de-identified longitudinal primary care EMR data from seven Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador). Provincial networks extract EMR data from consenting family physicians, nurse practitioners and community pediatricians and transfer de-identified data to CPCSSN to create a single pan-Canadian EMR-based data repository representing >1,800,000 Canadians. Data are included for all patients that attended an appointment with a consenting provider unless they opt-out of inclusion. The repository includes structured data fields and short-text fields including billing, health condition(s) (problem list), encounter diagnoses, medication(s), exam, plus patient, and provider tables. A cohort was created of active patients (defined as those seen at least once in the past 2 years) from the CPCSSN repository with data available up to December 31, 2019. The starting point of data is dependent on when providers initiated their use of their EMR, with most records going back 10 or more years.

      Reference set

      Among active patients from the CPCSSN repository, we created a sub-set of randomly selected patients’ EMR data for complete medical records review, to produce a positive and negative reference set for CVD. Random selection of records was performed using random number generator within SQL that accounted for the province of residency. Medical students and family medicine residents reviewed two files representing the EMR for 2,484 patients. The first was the clinical encounter note which contains a description of each encounter written by the provider and may include information on diagnosis, medication, blood pressures, and laboratory ordering. The second file included free-text entries in the health conditions, billing and encounter diagnosis table representing the diagnosis name typed into the EMR by the primary care provider following the patient’s encounter. Chart reviewers populated the data extraction table which included the following columns: diagnosis name, CVD (yes/no), type of CVD (i.e., CAD, CeVD, PVD), related conditions (e.g., MI, STEMI, stroke, vascular ulcer), plus documented symptoms and medications (Supplemental Appendix S2).
      The Public Health Agency of Canada

      Public Health Agency of Canada. Heart Disease in Canada. 2017. Retrieved online from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-fact-sheet/heart-disease-factsheet-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

      ,
      • Manuel D.G.
      • Leung M.
      • Nguyen K.
      • Tanuseputro P.
      • Johansen H.
      Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada.
      suggests that the Canadian prevalence of heart disease is 8%. Using an estimated prevalence of at least 8%, a margin of error of 5%, and desired power of 80%, the sample size required is 201 positive cases. Our reference set has 203 positive cases and 1,814 negative cases (Figure 1). Patients within our positive reference set required a CVD diagnosis (CVD, CAD, CeVD, or PVD) be documented in the EMR by their primary care provider. Some providers did not include a specific CVD diagnosis and documented ‘cardiovascular disease’ as the diagnosis, whereas other providers included a specific diagnosis for CAD, CeVD, or PVD. Cases were further reviewed for the presence of symptoms, medications, and referrals to demonstrate the validity of the diagnosis. Records were reviewed by ≥2 medical students/residents. Discrepancies were highlighted and reviewed by a third reviewer. Negative cases did not include any indication of CVD in the EMR including diagnosis, medications, blood pressures, laboratory ordering or referrals.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Flow diagram for creation of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) reference set from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN).

      Case definitions

      We reviewed the literature for previously applied CVD case definitions

      Cozzolino, F., Abraha, I., Orso, M., Mengoni, A., Cerasa, M.F., Eusebi, P., Ambrosio, G. and Montedori, A. (2017) ‘Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project’, BMJ Open, 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,
      • Ahmad F.S.
      • Chan C.
      • Rosenman M.B.
      • Post W.S.
      • Fort D.G.
      • Greenland P.
      • Liu K.J.
      • et al.
      Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
      • Goyal A.
      • Norton C.R.
      • Thomas T.N.
      • Davis R.L.
      • Butler J.
      • Ashok V.
      • Zhao L.
      • et al.
      Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
      • Kivimaki M.
      • Batty G.D.
      • Singh-Manoux A.
      • Britton A.
      • Brunner E.
      • Shipley M.
      Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.

      Finlayson G, Ekuma O, Yogendran M, Burland E, Forget E. The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2010.

      • Lix L.
      • Sobhan S.
      • St-Jean A.
      • Daigle J.M.
      • Fisher A.
      • Yu O.H.
      • et al.
      Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.

      Katz A, Martens P, Chateau D, Bogdanovic B, Koseva I, McDougall C, Boriskewich E. Understanding the Health System Use of Ambulatory Care Patients. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2013.

      Chartier M, Dart A, Tangri N, Komenda P, Walld R, Bogdanovic B, Burchill C, Koseva I, McGowan K-L, Rajotte L. Care of Manitobans Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2015.

      Bhagirath VC, Nash D, Wan D, Anand SS. Building your peripheral artery disease toolkit: Medical management of peripheral artery disease in 2022. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): 634-644. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2022.02.004

      Sontheimer D L. Peripheral Vascular Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment – American Family Physician [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1971.html

      • Lee D.W.
      • Cavender M.A.
      Guidelines for peripheral vascular disease: where is the evidence?.
      and tested our reference set compared to case definitions for CVD including separate definitions for CAD, CeVD, and PVD (Supplemental Appendix S1). Literature and clinical informed case definitions produced 20 case definitions for CAD, 5 case definitions for CeVD, and 2 case definitions for PVD (Supplemental Appendix S1). CVD case definition 1 and 2 were created using CAD, CeVD, and PVD case definitions that had strong sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (Supplemental Appendix S1 ). Case definition 15 and 18 were similar in their approach, we therefore chose to apply case definition 13 and 15 in CVD case definition 1 and 2, respectively. CVD case definitions 3 and 4 applied administrative-based CVD definitions (Table 1).

      Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P.L., Mo, H., Cronin, R.M., Warner, J.L. and Denny, J.C. (2016) ‘Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, pp. 20–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv130 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,
      • Tu K.
      • Wang M.
      • Young J.
      • Green D.
      • Ivers N.
      • Butt D.
      • Jaakkimainen L.
      • Kapral M.
      Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
      • Tu K.
      • Mitiku T.
      • Lee D.
      • Guo H.
      • Tu J.
      Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).

      Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson HG, Eschol JO, Kafa R, Girotra S, Winiecki S, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infraction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the sentinel distributed database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398-404. Doi:101002/pds.4398

      • Ahmad F.S.
      • Chan C.
      • Rosenman M.B.
      • Post W.S.
      • Fort D.G.
      • Greenland P.
      • Liu K.J.
      • et al.
      Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
      • Goyal A.
      • Norton C.R.
      • Thomas T.N.
      • Davis R.L.
      • Butler J.
      • Ashok V.
      • Zhao L.
      • et al.
      Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
      • Kivimaki M.
      • Batty G.D.
      • Singh-Manoux A.
      • Britton A.
      • Brunner E.
      • Shipley M.
      Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.

      Finlayson G, Ekuma O, Yogendran M, Burland E, Forget E. The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2010.

      • Lix L.
      • Sobhan S.
      • St-Jean A.
      • Daigle J.M.
      • Fisher A.
      • Yu O.H.
      • et al.
      Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.

      Katz A, Martens P, Chateau D, Bogdanovic B, Koseva I, McDougall C, Boriskewich E. Understanding the Health System Use of Ambulatory Care Patients. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2013.

      Chartier M, Dart A, Tangri N, Komenda P, Walld R, Bogdanovic B, Burchill C, Koseva I, McGowan K-L, Rajotte L. Care of Manitobans Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2015.

      Our definition focused purely on the vascular aspects comprising CVD and omitted risk factors (i.e. hypertension) and other sequalae of cardiac disease (i.e. heart failure, arrhythmias and valvular diseases) that have been included in some administrative data based definitions to capture more general cardiac disorders. Patients captured with CAD, CeVD or PVD were considered a CVD positive case. We identified prescribed medications using ATC codes (cardiac therapy (ATC: C01DA02, C01DA05, C01DA08, C01DA14, C01EB09), beta-blockers (ATC: C07), calcium channel blockers (ATC: C08CA01, C08CA02, C08DA01), ACE inhibitors (ATC: C09A, C09B), and ARB (ATC: C09C, C09D)). We compared agreement between our reference set and CVD case definitions (Table 1).
      Table 1Cardiovascular Disease Case Definitions for validation in the reference set
      Case definition 1CAD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 410-414 AND ≥2 medications for ATC codes starting with C01, C07, C08, C09 OR CeVD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 430-438 OR PVD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 440.xx, or 443.xx
      Case definition 2CAD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 410-414

      OR CeVD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 430-438

      OR PVD: ≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 440.xx, or 443.xx
      Case definition 3≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx for ICD-9 390-429, 430-448,458

      OR ≥1 ATC code from medication table for B01A, C01A, C01B, C01CA17, C01D, C02AA, C02AB, C02C, C02D, C02L, C03, C04AD, C05BA, C07AA01, C07AA02 C07AA03, C07AA04, C07AA06, C07AA07, C07AA12, C07AB, C07AG, C07B, C07C, C08, C09, C10
      Case definition 4≥1 Health Condition, billing or encounter dx within 1 year for ICD-9 390-429, 430-448,458

      OR ≥1 ATC code from medication table within 1 year for B01A, C01A, C01B, C01CA17, C01D, C02AA, C02AB, C02C, C02D, C02L, C03, C04AD, C05BA, C07AA01, C07AA02, C07AA03, C07AA04, C07AA06, C07AA07, C07AA12, C07AB, C07AG, C07B, C07C, C08, C09, C10
      CAD: coronary artery disease
      CeVD: cerebrovascular disease
      PVD: peripheral vascular disease
      ICD-9: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth edition, Clinical Modification
      ATC: Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code

      Statistical Analyses

      We compared the agreement of our reference set to case definitions using a 2x2 contingency table. We assessed the following metrics: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy for CVD, CAD, CeVD, and PVD case definitions. The equations for these metrics are presented below.
      Tabled 1
      PPVTP . TP + FP
      SensitivityTP .

      TP + FN
      NPVTN .

      TN + FN
      SpecificityTN .

      TN + FP
      AccuracyTP + TN

      TP + FP + FN + TN
      TP: true positive, TN: true negative, FN: false negative, FP: false positive
      We used the exact binomial test to estimate prevalence and respective confidence intervals. We evaluated the CAD, CeVD, and PVD definitions using sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to determine the best performing case definition. Using the best performing definition, we describe patients with and without CVD using descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation (SD), and frequency. We explore differences in patients with and without CVD using Chi-square and t-tests. Patient age was calculated at the index date of December 31, 2019. We applied CPCSSN validated case definitions for hypertension and diabetes.

      Williamson, T. et al. (2014) ‘Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records’, Annals of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.annfammed.org/content/12/4/367 (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      We identified conditions of interest using ICD-9 codes: dyslipidemia (ICD-9 code starting with 272), and heart failure (HF)
      • Vijh R.
      • Wong S.
      • Grandy M.
      • Peterson S.
      • Ezzat A.M.
      • Gibb A.G.
      • Hawkins N.M.
      Identifying heart failure in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease through the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in British Columbia: a case derivation study.
      (ICD-9 codes starting with 428 or 425 or ACE/ARB and beta blocker and diuretic prescribed). We used the most recent body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure (BP) recorded in the EMR for each patient. A BMI greater than or equal to 30 was considered obese. Visit frequency is an average of the mean number of visits in the previous three years (2017, 2018. 2019).
      Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS V9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
      This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba. The research reported in this paper adhered to STROBE guidelines.

      Results

      Our reference set included 2,017 patients with 203 positive cases and 1,814 negative cases (Figure 1). Among the positive cases there were 107 patients with CAD, 67 patients with CeVD, and 41 patients with PVD (Figure 1). Patients may have been labelled as having multiple components of CVD. There were 15 patients with CAD and CeVD, 11 patients with CAD and PVD, <5 patients with CeVD and PVD, and <5 patients with CAD, CeVD, and PVD. There were 20 cases with documentation indicating ‘cardiovascular disease’ but without sufficient details to determine the type of CVD. There were 467 patients excluded where medical record review was inconclusive and reviewers could not be certain if the patient did or did not have CVD. Using kappa statistic, the interrater agreement was 96.7% (95.1-98.4%). Our reference set included patients from AB (11.5%), ON (25.7%), QC (0.6%), NL (0.2%), MB (58.2%), NS (0.1%), and BC (3.7%). Representation in each province was influenced by the number of providers participating in CPCSSN and availability of free-text encounter notes within the repository. Patients within the reference set had a mean age of 57 years (compared to 42 years in the Canadian Census) and were more likely to be female (57.7% vs. 50.7%).

      Statistics Canada. (2022). Age, Sex at Birth and Gender Reference Guide: Census of Population, 2021. (No. 98-500-X issue 2021014). Available at https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/statcan/98-500-x/98-500-x2021014-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

      There were four case definitions for CVD. CVD case definitions 1 and 2 were developed based on case definitions validated to capture CAD, CeVD, and PVD. Case definition 2 had the strongest agreement with our reference set. CVD case definition 2 was built using the best preforming CAD, CeVD and PVD case definitions (i.e. case definition 15 for CAD, and case definition 1 for CeVD/PVD) and had a sensitivity of 76.9% (70.4-82.5%), specificity 97.2% (96.3-97.9%), PPV 75.4% (69.8-80.2%), and NPV 97.4% (96.7-97.8%). CVD case definition 1 was similar to case definition 2 but used CAD case definition 13 requiring ≥2 prescriptions for a related medication, which reduced the sensitivity to 68.5% (61.6-74.8%). (Table 2)
      Table 2Agreement between National Reference set for CVD and CVD case definitions* N=2017
      SenSpecPPVNPVAccuracy
      Case definition 168.47 (61.6-74.8)97.79 (97.01-98.42)77.65 (71.61-82.72)96.52 (95.77-97.14)94.84 (93.79-95.77)
      Case definition 276.85 (70.43-82.46)97.19 (96.32-97.9)75.36 (69.79-80.2)97.4 (96.69-97.97)95.14 (94.11-96.04)
      Case definition 394.58 (90.51-97.26)60.09 (57.79-62.35)20.96 (19.9-22.06)99.0 (98.24-99.44)63.56 (61.42-65.66)
      Case definition 459.11 (52.01-65.94)78.17 (76.2-80.05)23.26 (20.79-25.92)94.47 (93.53-95.28)76.25 (74.33-78.09)
      * Supplemental Appendix S1includes the agreement for the CAD, CeVD and PVD definitions
      More specifically, among the 20 case definitions for CAD (Supplemental Appendix S1), three had strong agreement with our CAD reference set. Case definitions 15 for CAD (i.e. ≥1 ICD9 410-414 in billing/encounter diagnosis or health condition tables) had (sensitivity 91.6% (84.6-96.1%), specificity 98.3% (97.6-98.8%), PPV 74.8% (67.8-80.7%), NPV 99.5% (99.1-99.7%)). This was similar to case definition 13 (i.e. ≥1 ICD9 410-414 in billing/encounter diagnosis or health condition tables, and ≥2 CVD meds) (sensitivity 72.0% (62.5-80.2%), specificity 99.1% (98.6-99.5%)) and case definition 17 (i.e. ≥1 health condition for 410-414, OR ≥2 billing or encounter ICD9 410-414) (sensitivity 79.4% (70.5-86.6%), specificity 98.9% (98.3-99.3%)).
      There were five definitions tested for capturing CeVD (Supplemental Appendix S1). Two had agreement statistics around 70%. Case definition 1 (i.e. ≥1 ICD9 430-438 in billing/encounter diagnosis or health condition tables) had a sensitivity 77.6% (65.8-86.9%), specificity 98.6% (97.9-99.0%), PPV 65.0% (55.7-73.3%), NPV 99.2% (98.8-99.5%). Case definition 5 (i.e. ≥1 Health condition for 430-438, OR ≥2 Billing or encounter ICD9 430-438) had a sensitivity 64.2% (51.5-75.5%), specificity 98.0% (98.699.5%), PPV 70.5% (59.3-79.6%), NPV 98.8% (98.3-99.1%).
      There were two case definitions tested for PVD, case definition 1 (i.e. ≥1 ICD-9 440.xx or 443, 443.9 in billing/encounter diagnosis or health condition tables) (sensitivity 36.6% (22.1-53.1%), specificity 99.0% (98.4-99.4%), PPV 42.9% (29.3-57.6%), NPV 98.7% (98.4-99.0%)) and case definition 2 (≥2 ICD9 440.xx or 443, 443.9) (sensitivity 12.2% (4.1-26.2%)), specificity 99.8%(99.4-99.9%), PPV 50.0% (23.1-76.9%), NPV 98.2% (98.0-98.4%)) (Supplemental Appendix S1).
      CVD case definitions 3 and 4 were based on administrative case definitions, which aimed to capture heart conditions more broadly and were inclusive of related illness and risk factors such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation and HF. Due to these inclusion criteria, case definition 3 and 4 had a much lower PPV (21.0%, CI 19.9-22.1, and 23.3%, CI 20.8-25.9%, respectively) (Table 2). However, when we assessed the agreement of CVD case definitions 3 and 4 within a reference set of patients with CVD, hypertension, HF or non-valvular atrial fibrillation, our agreement markedly improved. Case definition 3 had a sensitivity 97.3% (95.7-98.5%), specificity 76.6% (74.3-78.8%), PPV 63.9% (61.6-66.0%), and NPV 98.6% (97.7-99.1%) (Supplemental Appendix S1).
      There were 689,301 active patients in the CPCSSN dataset. When compared to the Canadian Census, CPCSSN patients were more likely to be female (56.3% vs. 50.7%) and older (52 years vs. 42 years). Upon applying case definition 2 to the active CPCSSN patient population (n=689,301), the estimated prevalence of CVD among patients seen in primary care settings is 11.2% (CI 11.1-11.3) (n= 77,064). When this is broken down into type of CVD there were 7.7% (n=53,173) patients with CAD, 3.4% (n=23,058) patients with CeVD, and 1.7% (n=11,896) patients with PVD. Case definition 1 provided a similar prevalence estimate (9.6%, CI 9.5-9.6%). As expected, case definitions 3 and 4 provided a much higher prevalence estimate (51.0%, CI 50.9-51.2% and 31.1%, CI 31.0-31.2%, respectively). Case definitions 3 and 4 represents a population with a larger group of CVD related conditions. Figure 2 describes the proportion and type of CVD identified among active CPCSSN patients along with the prevalence of various combinations. The majority had CAD (6.4%), followed by CeVD (2.3%), PVD (1.0%) and both CAD and CeVD (0.7%) (Figure 2).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Venn diagram demonstrating proportion of active patients in CPCSSN captured using the strongest CVD case definitions and the overlap of CAD, CeVD and PVD diagnosis in primary care settings.
      Table 3 characterized patients captured with CVD case definition 2 compared to patients not captured with CVD case definition 2. Patients captured with CVD case definition 2, were significantly more likely to be male (55.4% vs. 42.3%, p=<.001) and older (70.5 (SD14.4) vs. 50.0 (18.7), p=<.001). Patients captured with CVD case definition 2 were more likely to be diagnosed with hypertension (61.7% vs 24.3%, p=<.001), dyslipidemia (72.7% vs 34.6%, p=<.001), and/or HF (19.7% vs 2.3%, p=<.001). They were also more likely to be obese (8.4% vs. 5.9%, p=<.001). Seventy-five percent of patients captured with CVD case definition 2 were prescribed a CVD medication compared to 24.7% not captured (<.0001) (Table 3).
      Table 3Patients with at least 1 visit to a primary care provider participating in CPCSSN between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. N= 689,301
      Variable namePatients without CVD n= 612,237Patients with CVD (case definition 2) n= 77,064P-Value
      Patient sex (% male)258,657 (42.3%)42,644 (55.4%)<.0001
      Patient age (mean, (SD))50.0 (18.7)70.5 (14.4)<.0001
      Annual visit frequency (mean, (SD))2.6 (3.0)4.8 (5.5)<.0001
      Systolic blood pressure (mean, (SD))125 (16)130 (17)<.0001
      Diastolic blood pressure (mean, (SD))76.8 (10)74 (11)<.0001
      Obesity (BMI >=30)35,965 (5.9%)6,483 (8.4%)<.0001
      Diabetes68,515 (11.2%)23,169 (30.1%)<.0001
      Hypertension148,654 (24.3%)47,509 (61.7%)<.0001
      Heart Failure14,003 (2.3%)15,187 (19.7%)<.0001
      Dyslipidemia211,529 (34.6%)55,992 (72.7%)<.0001
      CVD medication151,236 (24.7%)57,924 (75.2%)<.0001
      Cardiac therapy7,935 (1.3%)18,917 (24.6%)<.0001
      Beta-blockers44,886 (7.3%)33,555 (43.5%)<.0001
      Calcium channel blockers59,365 (9.7%)25,720 (33.4%)<.0001
      ACE inhibitors81,693 (13.3%)37,563 (48.7%)<.0001
      ARB47,782 (7.8%)17,544 (22.8%)<.0001

      Discussion

      The creation and validation of an EMR-based case definition for CVD will be beneficial for disease surveillance as well as research and quality improvement. CVD case definition 2 had strong sensitivities, specificities, PPV and NPV compared to our reference data reflecting satisfactory capture based on the available documentation. Our EMR-based CVD case definition 2 included CAD, CeVD, and PVD and suggests an overall prevalence of 11.2% within primary care settings, with some patients managed in primary care diagnosed with more than one of these conditions (i.e., CAD, CeVD and PVD). Further, among the patients captured with CVD case definition 2, we found an association with several expected risk factors and comorbidities.

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      • Akil L.
      • Ahmad H.A.
      Relationships between Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases in Four Southern States and Colorado.
      • Wu C.-Y.
      • Hu H.-Y.
      • Chou Y.-J.
      • Huang N.
      • Chou Y.-C.
      • Li C.-P.
      High Blood Pressure and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortalities in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
      • Lee D.
      • Chiu M.
      • Manuel D.
      • Tu Karen
      • Wang X.
      • Austin P.
      • et al.
      Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Canada: temporal, socio-demographic and geographic factors.
      Application of our CVD, CAD, CeVD and PVD definitions found a prevalence of 11.2% 7.7%, 3.7% and 1.7%, respectively. Related literature has defined CVD sub-types including acute myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and CAD within similar ranges.

      McBrien, K.A., Souri, S., Symonds, N.E., Rouhi, A., Lethebe, B.C., Williamson, T.S., Garies, S., Birtwhistle, R., Quan, H., Fabreau, G.E. and Ronksley, P.E. (2018) ‘Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, pp. 1567–1578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy094 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      • Tu K.
      • Wang M.
      • Young J.
      • Green D.
      • Ivers N.
      • Butt D.
      • Jaakkimainen L.
      • Kapral M.
      Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
      • Tu K.
      • Mitiku T.
      • Lee D.
      • Guo H.
      • Tu J.
      Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).

      Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson HG, Eschol JO, Kafa R, Girotra S, Winiecki S, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infraction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the sentinel distributed database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398-404. Doi:101002/pds.4398

      • Ahmad F.S.
      • Chan C.
      • Rosenman M.B.
      • Post W.S.
      • Fort D.G.
      • Greenland P.
      • Liu K.J.
      • et al.
      Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
      • Goyal A.
      • Norton C.R.
      • Thomas T.N.
      • Davis R.L.
      • Butler J.
      • Ashok V.
      • Zhao L.
      • et al.
      Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
      • Kivimaki M.
      • Batty G.D.
      • Singh-Manoux A.
      • Britton A.
      • Brunner E.
      • Shipley M.
      Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.
      An analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study suggests that 9% of the population is diagnosed with IHD, HF or stroke.
      • Alam S.
      • Lang J.J.
      • Drucker A.M.
      • Gotay C.
      • Kozloff N.
      • Mate K.
      • Patten S.B.
      • et al.
      Assessment of the burden of disease and injuries attributable to risk factors in Canada from 1990 to 2016: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study.
      Much of the previous literature on CVD case validation has defined individual types of CVD and often used administrative data that was not generalizable to a broad primary care population.
      • Tu K.
      • Wang M.
      • Young J.
      • Green D.
      • Ivers N.
      • Butt D.
      • Jaakkimainen L.
      • Kapral M.
      Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
      • Tu K.
      • Mitiku T.
      • Lee D.
      • Guo H.
      • Tu J.
      Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).

      Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson HG, Eschol JO, Kafa R, Girotra S, Winiecki S, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infraction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the sentinel distributed database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398-404. Doi:101002/pds.4398

      • Ahmad F.S.
      • Chan C.
      • Rosenman M.B.
      • Post W.S.
      • Fort D.G.
      • Greenland P.
      • Liu K.J.
      • et al.
      Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
      • Goyal A.
      • Norton C.R.
      • Thomas T.N.
      • Davis R.L.
      • Butler J.
      • Ashok V.
      • Zhao L.
      • et al.
      Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
      • Kivimaki M.
      • Batty G.D.
      • Singh-Manoux A.
      • Britton A.
      • Brunner E.
      • Shipley M.
      Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.

      Finlayson G, Ekuma O, Yogendran M, Burland E, Forget E. The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2010.

      • Lix L.
      • Sobhan S.
      • St-Jean A.
      • Daigle J.M.
      • Fisher A.
      • Yu O.H.
      • et al.
      Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.

      Katz A, Martens P, Chateau D, Bogdanovic B, Koseva I, McDougall C, Boriskewich E. Understanding the Health System Use of Ambulatory Care Patients. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2013.

      Chartier M, Dart A, Tangri N, Komenda P, Walld R, Bogdanovic B, Burchill C, Koseva I, McGowan K-L, Rajotte L. Care of Manitobans Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2015.

      In fact, application of administrative case definitions in our study produced a prevalence of 51.0% and 31.1%, respectively. Few studies have examined CVD overall, which is relevant to understand the combined burden of atherosclerotic disease, which shares common risk factors and primary and secondary prevention strategies.

      McBrien, K.A., Souri, S., Symonds, N.E., Rouhi, A., Lethebe, B.C., Williamson, T.S., Garies, S., Birtwhistle, R., Quan, H., Fabreau, G.E. and Ronksley, P.E. (2018) ‘Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, pp. 1567–1578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy094 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      ,
      • Lix L.
      • Sobhan S.
      • St-Jean A.
      • Daigle J.M.
      • Fisher A.
      • Yu O.H.
      • et al.
      Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.
      ,

      Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Preventing the Global Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease: Meeting the Challenges in Developing Countries (2010) Fuster V, Kelly BB, editors. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. 4, Measurement and Evaluation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45691/ (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      Additionally, there is variability in the existing literature regrading application of case definitions only to adult population or not requiring an age modifier. Our CVD case definition which included CAD, CeVD, and PVD reported a sensitivity of 76.9% and a PPV of 75.4%. The strong sensitivity of our case definition highlights its potential application for understanding CVD epidemiology.

      Fuster V, Kelly BB. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease [Internet]. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. National Academies Press (US); 2010 [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45688/

      We expect that our CVD case definition was impacted by the performance of our case definitions for CAD, CeVD and PVD. In primary care CAD is the most frequently diagnosed of these CVD types. Case definition 15 had a sensitivity of 91.6% and a PPV of 74.8%. Tu et al. used a linked dataset of administrative data and EMR-billing records to validate a definition for ischemic heart disease, reporting a lower sensitivity of 77.0% and similar PPV of 78.8%.
      • Tu K.
      • Mitiku T.
      • Lee D.
      • Guo H.
      • Tu J.
      Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).
      The high sensitivity of the CAD definition can support studies aimed at inequalities in outcomes and epidemiology. The moderate PPV suggests the CAD definition could be used cautiously to define cohorts for medication studies.
      CeVD case definition 1 did not perform as well as the CAD definition it had a sensitivity of 77.6% and a PPV of 65.0% and an estimated prevalence of 3.4%. Tu et al. validated a definition for stroke/transient ischemic attack using administrative data and reported a sensitivity of 68.0% and a prevalence of 3.0% which is similar to our study.
      • Tu K.
      • Wang M.
      • Young J.
      • Green D.
      • Ivers N.
      • Butt D.
      • Jaakkimainen L.
      • Kapral M.
      Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
      PVD had a low sensitivity of 36.6% and PPV of 42.9% and should be used with caution. PVD is underdiagnosed and undertreated in primary care settings despite development of diagnostic tools and management guidelines.
      • Lee D.W.
      • Cavender M.A.
      Guidelines for peripheral vascular disease: where is the evidence?.
      Peripheral vascular disease often goes undiagnosed because the physical findings vary widely, and it can be difficult to diagnose because the symptoms may be more subtle.

      Sontheimer D L. Peripheral Vascular Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment – American Family Physician [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1971.html

      This PVD definition should be used in combination with CAD and CeVD definitions to capture patients with CVD.
      Age and sex are important risk factors for CVD. Similar to previous literature, our case definition found a male predisposition for CVD and demonstrated strong associations with age, obesity and hypertension.
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,

      Bots, S.H., Peters, S.A.E., Woodward, M., 2017. Sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke mortality: a global assessment of the effect of ageing between 1980 and 2010. BMJ

      • Rodgers J.L.
      • Jones J.
      • Bolleddu S.I.
      • Vanthenapalli S.
      • Rodgers L.E.
      • Shah K.
      • Karia K.
      • Panguluri S.K.
      Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging.
      • Joseph P.
      • Leong D.
      • McKee M.
      • Anand S.S.
      • Schwalm J.D.
      • Teo K.
      • Mente A.
      • Yusuf S.
      Reducing the Global burden of cardiovascular disease, Part 1: the epidemiology and risk factors.
      Patients captured with our case definition 2 have similar characteristics to previous literature lending credence to the accuracy and utility of our definition. As the Canadian population ages, an improved understanding of the epidemiology of CVD and its relationship to CVD risk factors can better inform and prepare for healthcare system needs.

      Fuster V, Kelly BB. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease [Internet]. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. National Academies Press (US); 2010 [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45688/

      ,
      • Rodgers J.L.
      • Jones J.
      • Bolleddu S.I.
      • Vanthenapalli S.
      • Rodgers L.E.
      • Shah K.
      • Karia K.
      • Panguluri S.K.
      Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging.
      Application of a valid CVD case definition can inform disease epidemiology, which often highlights modifiable risk factors and has the potential to yield efficient utilization of time and resources by researchers and policy makers. Additionally, it can streamline the disease surveillance mechanisms by characterizing the population at risk.

      Fuster V, Kelly BB. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease [Internet]. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. National Academies Press (US); 2010 [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45688/

      ,

      Dahlöf B. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Epidemiology and Risk Assessment. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2010 Jan 4;105(1, Supplement):3A-9A.

      In most healthcare systems in high income countries such as Canada, primary care providers are often the stewards of healthcare as they are frequently the first point of contact for patients. Primary care providers are involved in primary prevention, diagnosis, treatment and secondary prevention of diseases for their patients. In such settings, having a tool that facilitates improved disease surveillance can inform management algorithms and policies that are designed to manage the ever-rising cases of CVD.
      • Brar R.
      • Katz A.
      • Ferguson T.
      • Whitlock R.H.
      • Nella M.D.
      • Bohm C.
      • Rigatto C.
      • et al.
      Association of membership at a medical fitness facility with adverse health outcomes.
      • Barengo N.C.
      • Antikainen R.
      • Borodulin K.
      • Harald K.
      • Jousilahti P.
      Leisure-time physical activity reduces total and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence in older adults.
      • Nocon M.
      • Hiemann T.
      • M€uller-Riemenschneider F.
      • Thalau F.
      • Roll S.
      • Willich S.N.
      Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
      • O’Donovan G.
      • Lee I.M.
      • Hamer M.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality.
      • Hamer M.
      • Bauman A.
      • Bell J.A.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Examining associations between physical activity and cardiovascular mortality using negative control outcomes.
      • Kosowan L.
      • Shannon S.
      • Rothney J.
      • Halas G.
      • Enns J.
      • Holmqvist M.
      • Wener P.
      • Goertzen L.
      • Katz A.
      Informing the physical activity evaluation framework: A scoping review of reviews.
      As demonstrated in our study, patients captured by CVD case definition 2 visited their primary care provider more frequently each year compared to patients not captured by CVD case definition 2. Visit frequency can be attributed to both CVD as well as multiple comorbidities and risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Evidence has demonstrated that primary and secondary prevention using evidence-based interventions can reduce CVD mortality and morbidity.
      • Brar R.
      • Katz A.
      • Ferguson T.
      • Whitlock R.H.
      • Nella M.D.
      • Bohm C.
      • Rigatto C.
      • et al.
      Association of membership at a medical fitness facility with adverse health outcomes.
      • Barengo N.C.
      • Antikainen R.
      • Borodulin K.
      • Harald K.
      • Jousilahti P.
      Leisure-time physical activity reduces total and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence in older adults.
      • Nocon M.
      • Hiemann T.
      • M€uller-Riemenschneider F.
      • Thalau F.
      • Roll S.
      • Willich S.N.
      Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
      • O’Donovan G.
      • Lee I.M.
      • Hamer M.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality.
      • Hamer M.
      • Bauman A.
      • Bell J.A.
      • Stamatakis E.
      Examining associations between physical activity and cardiovascular mortality using negative control outcomes.
      • Kosowan L.
      • Shannon S.
      • Rothney J.
      • Halas G.
      • Enns J.
      • Holmqvist M.
      • Wener P.
      • Goertzen L.
      • Katz A.
      Informing the physical activity evaluation framework: A scoping review of reviews.
      This merits attention for primary care system design and resourcing aimed at both primary and secondary prevention of CVD.
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,
      • Malakar A.K.
      • Choudhury D.
      • Halder B.
      • Paul P.
      • Uddin A.
      • Chakraborty S.
      A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors and therapeutics.

      D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

      Nevertheless, addressing these risk factors with evidence-based interventions in primary care is possible and likely to have a greater impact on those with CVD.
      • Graham I.
      • Atar D.
      • Corch-Johnsen K.
      • Boysen G.
      • Burell G.
      • Cifkova R.
      • et al.
      European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).

      Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      ,
      • Kosowan L.
      • Katz A.
      • Halas G.
      • LaBine L.
      • Singer A.
      Using information technology to assess patient risk factors in primary care clinics: Pragmatic Evaluation.
      • Kosowan L.
      • Katz A.
      • Halas G.
      • Singer A.
      Patient perspectives on tablet-based technology to collect risk factor information in primary care.
      • Cykert S.
      • Keyserling T.C.
      • Pignone M.
      • DeWalt D.
      • Weiner B.J.
      • Trogdon J.G.
      • et al.
      A controlled trial of dissemintation and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.
      Since CVD impacts multiple organs (i.e. brain, heart, peripheral vasculature) it is co-managed by multiple practitioners, again re-enforcing the need for tools to support primary care providers who often frequently support care coordination and navigation for patients with multiple co-morbid conditions.

      Abramson BL, Al-Omran MA, Anand SS, Albalawi Z, Coutinho T, Mestral C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 guidelines for peripheral arterial disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): P560-P587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j/cjca.2022.02.029

      Limitations

      Whilst this study validated a case definition for CVD based on primary care EMR data with reasonable face validity, it is not without several limitations. The CPCSSN dataset includes a large number of patients and providers from various practice types and locations across Canada however, we are uncertain if our cohort is representative of other jurisdictions. Patients within the CPCSSN dataset were more likely to be female and older than the Canadian Census. The CPCSSN represents a population that had sought and accessed primary healthcare, future research should age- and sex-standardize prevalence estimates to describe prevalence estimates in a general Canadian population. This study accessed primary care EMR data for secondary purposes, but was unable to assess the accuracy of the documentation. This means that it is possible that in some instances, CVD or its component parts may be over- or under-diagnosed by the health care provider. This is less likely for serious conditions such as CAD and CeVD, which often have symptoms that are noticeable, require specific care in community settings and usually affect activities of daily living. It is possible that PVD diagnoses may have been omitted or underdiagnosed in some cases,

      Williamson, T. et al. (2014) ‘Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records’, Annals of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.annfammed.org/content/12/4/367 (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Preventing the Global Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease: Meeting the Challenges in Developing Countries (2010) Fuster V, Kelly BB, editors. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. 4, Measurement and Evaluation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45691/ (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      • Vijh R.
      • Wong S.
      • Grandy M.
      • Peterson S.
      • Ezzat A.M.
      • Gibb A.G.
      • Hawkins N.M.
      Identifying heart failure in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease through the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in British Columbia: a case derivation study.
      especially given the fact that it is known to be underdiagnosed and often managed outside of primary care, hence the less robust agreement.

      Sontheimer D L. Peripheral Vascular Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment – American Family Physician [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1971.html

      A related issue is that in some cases the medical records assessed do not specify the type of CVD, therefore using a broader CVD definition to describe patients may be more accurate when compared to capture of a type of CVD. Previous studies have demonstrated imperfect data quality of EMR records.
      • Singer A.
      • Yakubovich S.
      • Kroeker A.L.
      • et al.
      Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?.
      ,
      • Singer A.
      • Kroeker A.L.
      • Yakubovich S.
      • et al.
      Data quality in electronic medical records in Manitoba: Do problem lists reflect chronic disease as defined by prescriptions?.
      We cannot account for specialist consultations or specific investigations and operative reports (i.e., angiography, stress testing) that may be absent in primary care data, but would be present in administrative or hospital based data. However, our focus on diagnosis of CVD in primary care settings informs secondary prevention strategies provided by primary care providers. Future studies aiming to describe the complete spectrum of care could link primary and tertiary care data for CVD as well as assess unstructured data within a large and robust training set.

      Conclusions

      This study describes a validated highly specific definition of CVD, which is comprised of CAD, CeVD and PVD. The CVD cohort described has patient characteristics including comorbid conditions and risk factors consistent with the literature. Understanding the prevalence and disease burden for patients with CVD being managed in primary care settings can improve care for this important disease.

      Acknowledgements

      The authors would like to acknowledge William Peeler for his assistance in data curation.

      Funding Sources

      This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

      Disclosures

      Dr. Bell has received honoraria or grants from the following commercial and non-commercial organizations for consulting, speaking or research: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Sanofi, Bausch Health, Thrombosis Canada, Hypertension Canada, Canadian Cardiovascular Society. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

      Data Statement

      The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidential nature of the data governed by PHIA legislation but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      Supplementary material

      References

      1. World Health Organization (2017) Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed 1 June 2021).

        • Bansilal S.
        • Castellano J.M.
        • Fuster V.
        Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
        International Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 201: S1-S7
        • Graham I.
        • Atar D.
        • Corch-Johnsen K.
        • Boysen G.
        • Burell G.
        • Cifkova R.
        • et al.
        European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Caridology and Other Societies on Cardovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by intied experts).
        European Heart Journal. 2007; 28: 2375-2414https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm316
      2. Visseren FLJ, Mach R, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the task Force for Cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Hear Journal. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484

      3. Pearson, G.J. et al. (2021) ‘2021 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult’, Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016 (Accessed 1 June 2021)

      4. Arnett DK, Blumentha RS, Albert MA, et al 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.

      5. Public Health Agency of Canada. Heart Disease in Canada. 2017. Retrieved online from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-fact-sheet/heart-disease-factsheet-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

        • Manuel D.G.
        • Leung M.
        • Nguyen K.
        • Tanuseputro P.
        • Johansen H.
        Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada.
        Can J Cardiol. 2003; 19: 997-1004
      6. Abramson BL, Al-Omran MA, Anand SS, Albalawi Z, Coutinho T, Mestral C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 guidelines for peripheral arterial disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): P560-P587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j/cjca.2022.02.029

        • Malakar A.K.
        • Choudhury D.
        • Halder B.
        • Paul P.
        • Uddin A.
        • Chakraborty S.
        A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors and therapeutics.
        J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 16812-16823https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28350
      7. D’Agostino, R.B., Vasan, R.S., Pencina, M.J., Wolf, P.A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J.M. and Kannel, W.B. (2008) ‘General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study’, Circulation, 117, pp. 743–753. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 (Accessed 3 June 2021).

      8. Cooney, M.T., Dudina, A., D’Agostino, R. and Graham, I.M. (2010) ‘Cardiovascular Risk-Estimation Systems in Primary Prevention’, Circulation, 122, pp. 300–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852756 (Accessed 4 June 2021).

        • Akil L.
        • Ahmad H.A.
        Relationships between Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases in Four Southern States and Colorado.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011; 22: 61-72https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2011.0166
        • Wu C.-Y.
        • Hu H.-Y.
        • Chou Y.-J.
        • Huang N.
        • Chou Y.-C.
        • Li C.-P.
        High Blood Pressure and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortalities in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94e2160https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002160
        • Lee D.
        • Chiu M.
        • Manuel D.
        • Tu Karen
        • Wang X.
        • Austin P.
        • et al.
        Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Canada: temporal, socio-demographic and geographic factors.
        CMAJ. 2009; 181: E55-66https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081629
        • Brar R.
        • Katz A.
        • Ferguson T.
        • Whitlock R.H.
        • Nella M.D.
        • Bohm C.
        • Rigatto C.
        • et al.
        Association of membership at a medical fitness facility with adverse health outcomes.
        American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2021; 61: e215-e224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.011
        • Barengo N.C.
        • Antikainen R.
        • Borodulin K.
        • Harald K.
        • Jousilahti P.
        Leisure-time physical activity reduces total and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence in older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65: 504-510https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14694
        • Nocon M.
        • Hiemann T.
        • M€uller-Riemenschneider F.
        • Thalau F.
        • Roll S.
        • Willich S.N.
        Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008; 15: 239-246https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f55e09
        • O’Donovan G.
        • Lee I.M.
        • Hamer M.
        • Stamatakis E.
        Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 335-342https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8014
        • Hamer M.
        • Bauman A.
        • Bell J.A.
        • Stamatakis E.
        Examining associations between physical activity and cardiovascular mortality using negative control outcomes.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2019; 48: 1161-1166https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy272
        • Kosowan L.
        • Shannon S.
        • Rothney J.
        • Halas G.
        • Enns J.
        • Holmqvist M.
        • Wener P.
        • Goertzen L.
        • Katz A.
        Informing the physical activity evaluation framework: A scoping review of reviews.
        American Journal of Health Promotion. 2022; 36: 340-366https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211050059
      9. Cozzolino, F., Abraha, I., Orso, M., Mengoni, A., Cerasa, M.F., Eusebi, P., Ambrosio, G. and Montedori, A. (2017) ‘Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project’, BMJ Open, 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      10. Wei, W.-Q., Teixeira, P.L., Mo, H., Cronin, R.M., Warner, J.L. and Denny, J.C. (2016) ‘Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, pp. 20–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv130 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

      11. McBrien, K.A., Souri, S., Symonds, N.E., Rouhi, A., Lethebe, B.C., Williamson, T.S., Garies, S., Birtwhistle, R., Quan, H., Fabreau, G.E. and Ronksley, P.E. (2018) ‘Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, pp. 1567–1578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy094 (Accessed 29 June 2021).

        • Tu K.
        • Wang M.
        • Young J.
        • Green D.
        • Ivers N.
        • Butt D.
        • Jaakkimainen L.
        • Kapral M.
        Validity of administrative data for identifying patients who have had a stroke or transient attach using EMERALD as a reference standard.
        Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2013; 29: 1388-1394
        • Tu K.
        • Mitiku T.
        • Lee D.
        • Guo H.
        • Tu J.
        Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the electronic medical record administrative data linked database (EMRALD).
        Can J Cardiol. 2010; 26: e225-e228
      12. Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson HG, Eschol JO, Kafa R, Girotra S, Winiecki S, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infraction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the sentinel distributed database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398-404. Doi:101002/pds.4398

        • Ahmad F.S.
        • Chan C.
        • Rosenman M.B.
        • Post W.S.
        • Fort D.G.
        • Greenland P.
        • Liu K.J.
        • et al.
        Validity of Cardiovascular data from electronic sources: The multi-ethnic study of antherosclerosis and HealthLNK.
        Circulation. 2017; 136: 1207-1216https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027436
        • Goyal A.
        • Norton C.R.
        • Thomas T.N.
        • Davis R.L.
        • Butler J.
        • Ashok V.
        • Zhao L.
        • et al.
        Predictors of incident heart failure in a large insured population: A one million person-year follow-up study.
        Circ Heart Fail. 2010; 3: 698-705https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.938175
        • Kivimaki M.
        • Batty G.D.
        • Singh-Manoux A.
        • Britton A.
        • Brunner E.
        • Shipley M.
        Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records.
        Epidemiology. 2017; 28: 735-739https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000688
      13. Finlayson G, Ekuma O, Yogendran M, Burland E, Forget E. The Additional Cost of Chronic Disease in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2010.

        • Lix L.
        • Sobhan S.
        • St-Jean A.
        • Daigle J.M.
        • Fisher A.
        • Yu O.H.
        • et al.
        Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: A multi-database population-based cohort study.
        BMC Health Services Research. 2021; 21: 758https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06762-0
      14. Katz A, Martens P, Chateau D, Bogdanovic B, Koseva I, McDougall C, Boriskewich E. Understanding the Health System Use of Ambulatory Care Patients. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2013.

      15. Chartier M, Dart A, Tangri N, Komenda P, Walld R, Bogdanovic B, Burchill C, Koseva I, McGowan K-L, Rajotte L. Care of Manitobans Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2015.

      16. Bhagirath VC, Nash D, Wan D, Anand SS. Building your peripheral artery disease toolkit: Medical management of peripheral artery disease in 2022. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 38(5): 634-644. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2022.02.004

      17. Sontheimer D L. Peripheral Vascular Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment – American Family Physician [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1971.html

        • Lee D.W.
        • Cavender M.A.
        Guidelines for peripheral vascular disease: where is the evidence?.
        Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019; 12https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007561
      18. Williamson, T. et al. (2014) ‘Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records’, Annals of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.annfammed.org/content/12/4/367 (Accessed 2 June 2021).

      19. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Preventing the Global Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease: Meeting the Challenges in Developing Countries (2010) Fuster V, Kelly BB, editors. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. 4, Measurement and Evaluation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45691/ (Accessed 2 June 2021).

        • Vijh R.
        • Wong S.
        • Grandy M.
        • Peterson S.
        • Ezzat A.M.
        • Gibb A.G.
        • Hawkins N.M.
        Identifying heart failure in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease through the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in British Columbia: a case derivation study.
        CMAJ Open. 2021; 9: e376-383https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200183
      20. Statistics Canada. (2022). Age, Sex at Birth and Gender Reference Guide: Census of Population, 2021. (No. 98-500-X issue 2021014). Available at https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/statcan/98-500-x/98-500-x2021014-eng.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).

        • Alam S.
        • Lang J.J.
        • Drucker A.M.
        • Gotay C.
        • Kozloff N.
        • Mate K.
        • Patten S.B.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the burden of disease and injuries attributable to risk factors in Canada from 1990 to 2016: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study.
        CMAJ Open. 2019; 7: e140-e148https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180137
      21. Fuster V, Kelly BB. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease [Internet]. Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health. National Academies Press (US); 2010 [cited 2022 May 2]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45688/

      22. Bots, S.H., Peters, S.A.E., Woodward, M., 2017. Sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke mortality: a global assessment of the effect of ageing between 1980 and 2010. BMJ

        • Rodgers J.L.
        • Jones J.
        • Bolleddu S.I.
        • Vanthenapalli S.
        • Rodgers L.E.
        • Shah K.
        • Karia K.
        • Panguluri S.K.
        Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging.
        J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019; 6: 19https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd6020019
        • Joseph P.
        • Leong D.
        • McKee M.
        • Anand S.S.
        • Schwalm J.D.
        • Teo K.
        • Mente A.
        • Yusuf S.
        Reducing the Global burden of cardiovascular disease, Part 1: the epidemiology and risk factors.
        Circ Res. 2017; 121: 677-694https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.308903
      23. Dahlöf B. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Epidemiology and Risk Assessment. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2010 Jan 4;105(1, Supplement):3A-9A.

        • Kosowan L.
        • Katz A.
        • Halas G.
        • LaBine L.
        • Singer A.
        Using information technology to assess patient risk factors in primary care clinics: Pragmatic Evaluation.
        JMIR Formative Research. 2021; 5e24382https://doi.org/10.2196/24382
        • Kosowan L.
        • Katz A.
        • Halas G.
        • Singer A.
        Patient perspectives on tablet-based technology to collect risk factor information in primary care.
        BMC Family Practice. 2021; 22: 103https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01443-7
        • Cykert S.
        • Keyserling T.C.
        • Pignone M.
        • DeWalt D.
        • Weiner B.J.
        • Trogdon J.G.
        • et al.
        A controlled trial of dissemintation and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.
        Health Ser Res. 2020; 55: 944-953https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13571
        • Singer A.
        • Yakubovich S.
        • Kroeker A.L.
        • et al.
        Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23: 1107-1112
        • Singer A.
        • Kroeker A.L.
        • Yakubovich S.
        • et al.
        Data quality in electronic medical records in Manitoba: Do problem lists reflect chronic disease as defined by prescriptions?.
        Can Fam Physician. 2017; 63: 382-389