ABSTRACT
Background
For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) having ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) despite taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), the optimal strategy for ongoing anticoagulation is unknown.
Methods
Using provincial administrative databases in Alberta, Canada, we compared anticoagulant use before/after the breakthrough stroke/TIA and assessed recurrence of stroke/TIA or bleeding, with consideration of medication adherence. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) being >80%.
Results
Amongst 985 patients, median age was 80 (13) years with a mean CHADS2 score of 1.7+1 prior to index event. Patients were followed for 643 (836) days. Following the index stroke/TIA event, 623 patients (63%) filled the same DOAC regimen, 83 (8%) filled a different dose, 155 (16%) switched DOAC agents, 51 (5%) switched to warfarin and 73 (7%) filled no OAC. Patients who kept the same regimen more commonly had TIA index events (59%); patients that changed dose or drug more often had stroke index events (55-78%). During follow up, 135 (14%) had stroke/TIA recurrence and 46 (5%) had bleeding; rates of each did not differ between prescribing patterns. Post-index event, proportion of patients with PDC >80% improved from 55% to 80%.
Conclusions
While most maintained the same DOAC regimen after stroke/TIA, rates of recurrent stroke/TIA and bleeding were similar across prescribing patterns. Stroke/TIA severity may have influenced prescribing practices. DOAC adherence improved post-stroke/TIA and signals an opportunity for optimization in patients with AF.
INTRODUCTION
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered cardiac arrhythmia and confers significant risk for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA).
1- Chugh S.S.
- Havmoeller R.
- Narayanan K.
- et al.
Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation.
When risk of stroke is sufficiently high based on risk stratification schemes such as CHADS
2, CHADS
2-VASc or CHADS-65, guidelines for AF recommend anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin.
2- Andrade J.G.
- Aguilar M.
- Atzema C.
- et al.
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
,3January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2019;140(2):e125–e151.
However, despite anticoagulation of AF with DOACs, there remains approximately a 1 per 100 patient years residual risk of stroke and systemic embolism, as reported within the large DOAC clinical trials.
4- Connolly S.J.
- Ezekowitz M.D.
- Yusuf S.
- et al.
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
, 5Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV et al. Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365(11):981–992.
, 6- Patel M.R.
- Mahaffey K.W.
- Garg J.
- et al.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation guidelines recommend that patients who experience a stroke while on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy be managed with an emphasis on addressing medication adherence, ensuring guideline concordant dosing, and avoiding drug interactions.
2- Andrade J.G.
- Aguilar M.
- Atzema C.
- et al.
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
In the absence of such contributory factors, a switch to another OAC may be considered;
2- Andrade J.G.
- Aguilar M.
- Atzema C.
- et al.
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
,7Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace 2016;18(11):1609–1678.
there is however a lack of robust clinical evidence to describe and support such a strategy. While there are no randomized trials directly comparing the efficacy of DOACs, a strategy of changing the original DOAC to one with an alternative mechanism of action has been utilized by prescribers.
8Kajy M, Mathew A, Ramappa P. Treatment Failures of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Am J Ther 2021;28(1):e87–95.
A recent retrospective cohort study suggested that changing OAC type is not associated with reduced rates of stroke recurrence compared to no change in OAC, though this study focused on patients anticoagulated with vitamin K antagonists.
9- Seiffge D.J.
- Marchis G.M.D.
- Koga M.
- et al.
Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Given the uncertainty of clinical outcomes with these varying treatment options, we sought to describe OAC prescribing in patients with AF following an ischemic stroke/TIA while already taking a DOAC and assess recurrent stroke/TIA and bleeding outcomes post-stroke with consideration of medication adherence.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients within each anticoagulant prescribing strategy pre- versus post-index event, based on OAC pharmacy fills. Strategies were pre-defined as those that kept same DOAC regimen, kept same DOAC agent but changed dose, changed to an alternative DOAC, changed to warfarin or did not fill an OAC. Secondarily, we sought to determine the proportion having recurrent stroke/TIA, or an occurrence of a bleeding event requiring medical attention. A recurrent stroke/TIA was identified via ICD-10 codes for ischemic stroke or TIA within inpatient, emergency, and outpatient settings (Supplemental Table S1). Bleeding events were defined as either: fatal, intracerebral, subarachnoid, other critical area, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or other bleeding based on ICD-10 codes within a hospital inpatient setting (Supplemental Table S1); or bleeding based on the ICD-10 codes in an emergency department requiring a transfusion of whole blood or packed red blood cells. Patient follow up ceased with a clinical event including recurrent stroke/TIA, bleeding, or death. In the absence of these outcomes, patients were followed to the end of the study period, which encompassed a minimum of 6 months for all patients.
Medication adherence was investigated using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. PDC measures the ratio of total days covered by refills within a period to the total number of days from first fill to the end of the period.
11- Ozaki A.F.
- Choi A.S.
- Le Q.T.
- et al.
Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The period was 1 year unless follow up ended due to a clinical event. Patients with a PDC ratio
>80% were considered adherent, as a PDC <80% is a known risk factor for AF-related stroke.
11- Ozaki A.F.
- Choi A.S.
- Le Q.T.
- et al.
Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
,12Alberts MJ, Peacock WF, Fields LE et al. Association between once- and twice-daily direct oral anticoagulant adherence in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients and rates of ischemic stroke. Int J Cardiol;215:11–13.
Data analysis
Descriptive results are presented as proportions, mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range]. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was based on the modified Cockcroft-Gault standardized to a weight of 72kg, using the last recorded creatinine value prior to discharge from the index event. A Cox regression model was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrent stroke/TIA risk factors. Statistical tests were performed with level of significance of p<0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board (Pro00104912).
DISCUSSION
In this study, the most common strategy to manage anticoagulation after a stroke/TIA despite DOAC therapy was to keep the same DOAC regimen (63% of patients), followed by changing to another DOAC (16%), changing the dose (8%), changing to warfarin (5%) and no OAC (7%). Over a median follow up time of 643 days after their initial event, 7% of the cohort had a stroke, 8% had a TIA, and 5% had a bleeding event. The rates of stroke seen in this cohort are comparable to previous observational studies examining rates of AF-related strokes with prior anticoagulation,
9- Seiffge D.J.
- Marchis G.M.D.
- Koga M.
- et al.
Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
,13- Tanaka K.
- Koga M.
- Lee K.J.
- et al.
Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Ischemic Stroke Patients with Prior Anticoagulation have Higher Risk for Recurrent Stroke.
as were bleeding rates.
14- Van Rein N.
- Heide-Jørgensen U.
- Lijfering W.M.
- Dekkers O.M.
- Sørensen H.T.
- Cannegieter S.C.
Major Bleeding Rates in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Single, Dual, or Triple Antithrombotic Therapy.
Overall, proportions of patients with stroke/TIA recurrence and bleeding events were similar between the different prescribing strategies in this study. This result is similar to a previous analysis showing a change in OAC, primarily from vitamin K antagonists, was not associated with decreased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to unchanged OAC.
9- Seiffge D.J.
- Marchis G.M.D.
- Koga M.
- et al.
Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
While these results do not point to a preferred approach to managing anticoagulation, they may reflect the importance of an individualized decision-making process. For example, severity of index event appeared to have influenced prescribing patterns, since patients experiencing TIA and shorter hospital stays were more commonly maintained on the same DOAC regimen, while patients with stroke and comparatively longer length of stays more frequently had dose changes or were switched to an alternative anticoagulant therapy.
In clinical practice, patients presenting with stroke/TIA events despite anticoagulant therapy require assessment to determine if treatment failure occurred or if they were on inadequate therapy due to poor adherence, or other factors such as discordant dosing and drug-drug interactions. Adherence of our cohort improved post-index event with proportion with PDC
>80%increasing from 55% to 85%. The proportion of patients with PDC <80% pre-index event is higher than that seen in previous studies,
11- Ozaki A.F.
- Choi A.S.
- Le Q.T.
- et al.
Real-World Adherence and Persistence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
,12Alberts MJ, Peacock WF, Fields LE et al. Association between once- and twice-daily direct oral anticoagulant adherence in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients and rates of ischemic stroke. Int J Cardiol;215:11–13.
suggesting that poor adherence was a factor for breakthrough strokes/TIAs requiring intervention in our cohort. With adherence improving across all prescribing categories post-index event, this aligns with a practice of encouraging adherence and implementing strategies such as compliance packaging regardless of therapy prescribed. However, those that have breakthrough stroke/TIA despite good adherence may carry intrinsically strong drivers of thrombogenesis that outmatch normally sufficient levels of anticoagulation, or exhibit pharmacokinetic variability that causes inadequate anticoagulation despite guideline concordant dosing, such as poor absorption or excessive metabolism. This risk-enriched population that has already failed stroke-prevention once may benefit greatly from DOAC steady state concentration measurements to rule out pharmacokinetic reasons for failure. Calibrated, DOAC-specific assays are becoming more widely available, such that their integration into initial assessment protocols may help individualize and improve upon overall stroke/TIA treatment.
Changing to an alternative anticoagulant in the absence of factors compromising anticoagulation is a recommendation included in guidelines based on expert opinion.
2- Andrade J.G.
- Aguilar M.
- Atzema C.
- et al.
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
,8Kajy M, Mathew A, Ramappa P. Treatment Failures of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Am J Ther 2021;28(1):e87–95.
For patients in our population that changed DOAC agents, switching to apixaban was the predominant strategy. Although apixaban is associated with superiority over warfarin in reducing AF-related stroke or systemic embolism, bleeding and mortality
5Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV et al. Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365(11):981–992.
and is one of the most used DOACs in current practice, there are no randomized, head-to-head trials to date that compare the efficacy and safety of the available DOACs. Of interest, adherence post-index event improved despite most patients being switched to apixaban, which is criticized for being more difficult to adhere to due to twice daily dosing compared to rivaroxaban.
The year of index event was highly predictive of the strategy to change to warfarin. From 2011 to 2012 in our cohort, dabigatran and warfarin were the only available oral anticoagulant agents for stroke prevention in AF. From 2013 onwards, the annual proportion of patients switching to warfarin declined due to availability of apixaban and rivaroxaban, and across the last two years of follow up, apixaban and rivaroxaban were the most common DOACs and were used at similar rates (Supplemental Figure S1)
Patients that did not fill any OACs following their index event had substantially shorter follow up times with a median of 40 days [191], during which 63% died, 32% had a recurrent stroke/TIA and 7% had a bleeding event. This categorization likely represented patients with poor prognosis.
This study has a number of limitations associated with design as a retrospective, observational study of administrative data using diagnostic codes. All characteristics of breakthrough stroke/TIA during DOAC treatment could not be accounted for, including stroke severity data, alternate stroke etiologies and suboptimal risk factor management of alcohol use, tobacco use, sleep apnea, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; such information could better rationalize decisions to continue or change DOAC regimens. Body weight, anti-Xa level and/or thrombin time on admission would also improve evaluation of DOAC use, while non-prescription medication use would allow thorough investigation of drug-drug interactions.
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
May 3,
2023
Received in revised form:
April 17,
2023
Received:
March 8,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
FUNDING SOURCES: No funding was received for this study.
DISCLOSURES:
GJ received funding from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and National Institutes of Health, all unrelated to the current study.
TJB received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer, and advisory board honoraria from Pfizer, all not related to this manuscript.
ED, ML, MH and KGP have nothing to disclose.
Copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society.